Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning

Separating the mechanisms that influence ecosystem functioning has been a goal of recent high profile experiments. Integrating the various experimental and analytical methods that attempt this goal across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, as well as careful definition of 'complementarity', produces novel insights and valuable lessons about new directions for research. (1) Experimental designs differ in temporal scale and whether standing stock or another ecosystem process was the response variable. (2) Mathematically identical variables in different designs have contrasting ecological interpretations. For example, different sets of ecological processes can contribute to different variables in different experimental designs. 13) The frequency of transgressive overyielding of standing stock (e.g. total above ground biomass) in polycultures implies little about the prevalence of transgressive overyielding in other ecosystem processes. (4) Measuring the contribution to ecosystem functioning of individual species, rather than just total ecosystem functioning of a polyculture, is not essential for estimating effects of complementarily. (5) Further research will profit from distinguishing standing stock from. all other ecosystem functions. (6) None of the analytic methods can distinguish the effects of individual processes or mechanisms such as resource use differentiation, facilitation, or allelopathy. for which additional experimental treatments are required.

[1]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Jill McGrady-Steed,et al.  Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability , 1997, Nature.

[3]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation , 2002, Nature.

[4]  P. Jolliffe.  The replacement series , 2000 .

[5]  O. Petchey.  Species Diversity, Species Extinction, and Ecosystem Function , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Andy Hector,et al.  Community diversity and invasion resistance: An experimental test in a grassland ecosystem and a review of comparable studies , 2001, Ecological Research.

[7]  M. Emmerson,et al.  Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations , 2000 .

[8]  D. Wardle.  Is "Sampling Effect" a Problem for Experiments Investigating Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Relationships? , 1999 .

[9]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[10]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[11]  M. Austin,et al.  A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures? , 1997 .

[12]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[13]  B. Schmid,et al.  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY: A CLASSIFICATION OF HYPOTHESES AND EXPLORATION OF EMPIRICAL RESULTS , 1999 .

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. , 2000, Science.

[15]  R. Ryel,et al.  Mechanisms of positive biodiversity–production relationships: insights provided by δ13C analysis in experimental Mediterranean grassland plots , 2001 .

[16]  B. Trenbath,et al.  Biomass Productivity of Mixtures , 1974 .

[17]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[18]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments , 1998 .

[19]  A. Hector.  The effect of diversity on productivity : detecting the role of species complementarity , 1998 .

[20]  D. Tilman.  Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition , 1997 .

[21]  M. Huston.  A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Fridley.  The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? , 2001 .

[23]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Biodiversity and Plant Litter: Experimental Evidence Which Does Not Support the View That Enhanced Species Richness Improves Ecosystem Function , 1997 .

[24]  Design and analysis of biodiversity field experiments , 2001, Ecological Research.

[25]  D. Tilman.  Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[26]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biodiversity , 2000 .

[27]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  L. Aarssen.  High productivity in grassland ecosystems : effected by species diversity or productive species ? , 1997 .

[29]  C. Körner,et al.  Above-ground resource use increases with plant species richness in experimental grassland ecosystems , 2000 .

[30]  Osvaldo E. Sala,et al.  Ecology: Price put on biodiversity , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[32]  Martin Solan,et al.  Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling , 1998 .

[34]  W. Carson,et al.  Phenological complementarity, species diversity, and ecosystem function , 2001 .

[35]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores , 2001 .

[36]  D. Tilman.  Biodiversity: Population Versus Ecosystem Stability , 1995 .

[37]  J. Lepš,et al.  Procedure for separating the selection effect from other effects in diversity–productivity relationship , 2001 .

[38]  D. Hooper.  THE ROLE OF COMPLEMENTARITY AND COMPETITION IN ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO VARIATION IN PLANT DIVERSITY , 1998 .

[39]  J. Roy,et al.  Separating the chance effect from other diversity effects in the functioning of plant communities , 2001 .

[40]  A. Williams,et al.  A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs , 2001, Ecological Research.

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[42]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[43]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.