Mutations as trapdoors to two competing native conformations of the Rop-dimer

Conformational transitions play a central role in regulating protein function. Structure-based models with multiple basins have been used to understand the mechanisms governing these transitions. A model able to accommodate multiple folding basins is proposed to explore the mutational effects in the folding of the Rop-dimer (Rop). In experiments, Rop mutants show unusually strong increases in folding rates with marginal effects on stability. We investigate the possibility of two competing conformations representing a parallel (P) and the wild-type antiparallel (AP) arrangement of the monomers as possible native conformations. We observe occupation of both distinct states and characterize the transition pathways. An interesting observation from the simulations is that, for equivalent energetic bias, the transition to the P basin (non-wild-type basin) shows a lower free-energy barrier. Thus, the rapid kinetics observed in experiments appear to be the result of two competing states with different kinetic behavior, triggered upon mutation by the opening of a trapdoor arising from Rop's symmetric structure. The general concept of having competing conformations for the native state goes beyond explaining Rop's mutational behaviors and can be applied to other systems. A switch between competing native structures might be triggered by external factors to allow, for example, allosteric control or signaling.

[1]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[2]  G. Cesareni,et al.  Control of ColE1 DNA replication: the rop gene product negatively affects transcription from the replication primer promoter. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jeanette Tångrot,et al.  Complete change of the protein folding transition state upon circular permutation , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[7]  L Regan,et al.  Speeding up protein folding: mutations that increase the rate at which Rop folds and unfolds by over four orders of magnitude. , 1997, Folding & design.

[8]  Osamu Miyashita,et al.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Slow protein conformational dynamics from multiple experimental structures: the helix/sheet transition of arc repressor. , 2005, Structure.

[12]  J. Tomizawa,et al.  Control of cole 1 plasmid replication: Enhancement of binding of RNA I to the primer transcript by the rom protein , 1984, Cell.

[13]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[14]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  D. Crothers,et al.  Bent helix formation between RNA hairpins with complementary loops. , 1995, Science.

[16]  N. Go,et al.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding, and fluctuations by computer simulation. II. A. Three‐dimensional lattice model of lysozyme , 1978 .

[17]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Symmetry and frustration in protein energy landscapes: a near degeneracy resolves the Rop dimer-folding mystery. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[19]  S. Plotkin Determination of barrier heights and prefactors from protein folding rate data. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Comparison of stochastic optimization methods for all-atom folding of the Trp-Cage protein. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[21]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Probing the instabilities in the dynamics of helical fragments from mouse PrPC. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Exploring structures in protein folding funnels with free energy functionals: the transition state ensemble. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[24]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Atomic-Level Description of Amyloid β-Dimer Formation , 2006 .

[25]  L. Regan,et al.  Dramatic structural and thermodynamic consequences of repacking a protein's hydrophobic core. , 2000, Structure.

[26]  J M Sturtevant,et al.  What makes a protein a protein? Hydrophobic core designs that specify stability and structural properties , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: the nature of the transition state ensemble. , 1996, Folding & design.

[28]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  The protein folding 'speed limit'. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  S. White,et al.  Peptides in lipid bilayers: structural and thermodynamic basis for partitioning and folding , 1994 .

[30]  Julia G. Lyubovitsky,et al.  Mapping the cytochrome C folding landscape. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  M Kokkinidis,et al.  Structure of the ColE1 rop protein at 1.7 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[33]  M Kokkinidis,et al.  Protein plasticity to the extreme: changing the topology of a 4-alpha-helical bundle with a single amino acid substitution. , 1999, Structure.

[34]  C. Sander,et al.  The structure of ColE1 rop in solution , 1991, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[35]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Low barrier kinetics: Dependence on observables and free energy surface , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[36]  Dmitri K. Klimov,et al.  Insights into Specific Problems in Protein Folding Using Simple Concepts , 2002 .

[37]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  The effects of nonnative interactions on protein folding rates: Theory and simulation , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  A. Schug,et al.  An evolutionary strategy for all-atom folding of the 60-amino-acid bacterial ribosomal protein l20. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition states using native topology based energy landscapes. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Thomas J Magliery,et al.  A cell-based screen for function of the four-helix bundle protein Rop: a new tool for combinatorial experiments in biophysics. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[41]  A. Schug,et al.  Reproducible protein folding with the stochastic tunneling method. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[42]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Multiple-basin energy landscapes for large-amplitude conformational motions of proteins: Structure-based molecular dynamics simulations , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..

[44]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .

[45]  K. Ginalski Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  M. Kokkinidis,et al.  Loopless Rop: structure and dynamics of an engineered homotetrameric variant of the repressor of primer protein. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[47]  D C Richardson,et al.  The Alacoil: A very tight, antiparallel coiled‐coil of helices , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.