Preference Dissemination by Sharing Viewpoints

The Web currently stores two types of content. These contents include linked data from the semantic Web and user contributions from the social Web. Our aim is to represent simplified aspects of these contents within a unified topological model and to harvest the benefits of integrating both content types in order to prompt collective learning and knowledge discovery. In particular, we wish to capture the phenomenon of Serendipity (i.e., incidental learning) using a subjective knowledge representation formalism, in which several “viewpoints” are individually interpretable from a knowledge graph. We prove our own Viewpoints approach by evidencing the collective learning capacity enabled by our approach. To that effect, we build a simulation that disseminates knowledge with linked data and user contributions, similar to the way the Web is formed. Using a behavioral model configured to represent various Web navigation strategies, we seek to optimize the distribution of preference systems. Our results outline the most appropriate strategies for incidental learning, bringing us closer to understanding and modeling the processes involved in Serendipity. An implementation of the Viewpoints formalism kernel is available. The underlying Viewpoints model allows us to abstract and generalize our current proof of concept for the indexing of any type of data set.

[1]  Hisaaki Yamaba,et al.  On a serendipity-oriented recommender system based on folksonomy , 2013, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[2]  Simon Colton,et al.  Modelling serendipity in a computational context , 2014, ArXiv.

[3]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  Un cycle de vie complet pour l'enrichissement sémantique des folksonomies , 2011, EGC.

[5]  Marcus Bowles,et al.  Relearning to E-learn: Strategies for Electronic Learning and Knowledge , 2004 .

[6]  Allen Tough,et al.  Reflections on the study of adult learning , 1999 .

[7]  G. Edelman Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[8]  Philippe Lemoisson,et al.  Viewpoints: An Alternative Approach toward Business Intelligence , 2013 .

[9]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[10]  Cesar Augusto Tacla,et al.  Integrating Social Web with Semantic Web - Ontology Learning and Ontology Evolution from Folksonomies , 2009, KEOD.

[11]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[12]  Clement Jonquet,et al.  Construction et évolution de connaissances par confrontation de points de vue : prototype pour la recherche d'information scientifique , 2014, IC.

[13]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[14]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Comparison of Ontology-based Semantic-Similarity Measures , 2008, AMIA.

[15]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[16]  Seong-Bae Park,et al.  Learning the emergent knowledge from annotated blog postings , 2010, J. Web Semant..

[17]  Elinor G. Barber,et al.  The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science , 2004 .

[18]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Emergent Semantics Principles and Issues , 2004, DASFAA.

[19]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[20]  Dimitris Apostolou,et al.  Consensus Building in Collaborative Ontology Engineering Processes , 2006 .

[21]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[22]  G. Fine,et al.  Three principles of Serendip : insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research , 1996 .

[23]  Peter Mika,et al.  Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics , 2005, J. Web Semant..