Evaluating the repeatability and set-up sensitivity of a large field of view distortion phantom and software for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy

Background and purpose Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy requires geometrically accurate MR images over the full scanner Field of View (FoV). This study aimed to investigate the repeatability of distortion measurements made using a commercial large FoV phantom and analysis software and the sensitivity of these measurements to small set-up errors. Materials and methods Geometric distortion was measured using a commercial phantom and software with 2D and 3D acquisition sequences on three different MR scanners. Two sets of repeatability measurements were made: three scans acquired without moving the phantom between scans (single set-up) and five scans acquired with the phantom re-set up in between each scan (repeated set-up). The set-up sensitivity was assessed by scanning the phantom with an intentional 1 mm lateral offset and independently an intentional 1° rotation. Results The mean standard deviation of distortion for all phantom markers for the repeated set-up scans was <0.4mm for all scanners and sequences. For the 1mm lateral offset scan 90% of the markers agreed within two standard deviations of the mean of the repeated set-up scan (median of all scanners and sequences, range 78%–93%). For the 1° rotation scan, 80% of markers agreed within two standard deviations of the mean (range 69%–93%). Conclusions Geometric distortion measurements using a commercial phantom and associated software appear repeatable, although with some sensitivity to set-up errors. This suggests the phantom and software are appropriate for commissioning a MR-only radiotherapy workflow.

[1]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  V S Khoo,et al.  New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Peter Metcalfe,et al.  Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom. , 2015, Medical physics.

[4]  L Chen,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of MRI-based treatment planning for prostate cancer , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Yue Cao,et al.  Phantom-based characterization of distortion on a magnetic resonance imaging simulator for radiation oncology , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  C. Njeh,et al.  Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy , 2008, Journal of medical physics.

[7]  Tiina Seppälä,et al.  Commissioning of MRI‐only based treatment planning procedure for external beam radiotherapy of prostate , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Filip Claus,et al.  Interobserver Delineation Variation Using CT versus Combined CT + MRI in Intensity–Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[9]  R Bosca,et al.  SU-G-JeP2-13: Spatial Accuracy Evaluation for Real-Time MR Guided Radiation Therapy Using a Novel Large-Field MRI Distortion Phantom. , 2016, Medical physics.

[10]  Ludvig Paul Muren,et al.  Open issues in Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology , 2017 .

[11]  Maria A Schmidt,et al.  Radiotherapy planning using MRI , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J Yang,et al.  Investigation of MR image distortion for radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Yue Cao,et al.  Clinical applications for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[14]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  D Jaffray,et al.  TU-G-134-02: A Harmonic Field Approach to Quantifying MRI Spatial Accuracy for MRIgRT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[16]  W. Sobol,et al.  Recent advances in MRI technology: Implications for image quality and patient safety. , 2012, Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society.

[17]  Peter Metcalfe,et al.  MRI geometric distortion: Impact on tangential whole‐breast IMRT , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[18]  D Thorwarth,et al.  Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions—a review , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  B. Erickson,et al.  Comprehensive MRI simulation methodology using a dedicated MRI scanner in radiation oncology for external beam radiation treatment planning. , 2014, Medical physics.

[20]  M. Moerland,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques for radiotherapy planning. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[21]  Deming Wang,et al.  A novel phantom and method for comprehensive 3-dimensional measurement and correction of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Keith Wachowicz,et al.  Evaluation of active and passive shimming in magnetic resonance imaging , 2014 .

[23]  Tufve Nyholm,et al.  Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[24]  Ersin Bayram,et al.  Optimization of a novel large field of view distortion phantom for MR‐only treatment planning , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[25]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Jurgen Fripp,et al.  Automatic Substitute Computed Tomography Generation and Contouring for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Alone External Beam Radiation Therapy From Standard MRI Sequences. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Peter Metcalfe,et al.  MRI distortion: considerations for MRI based radiotherapy treatment planning , 2014, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[28]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algorithm. , 2015, Medical physics.

[29]  Rabih Hammoud,et al.  Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  Ken-Pin Hwang,et al.  Spatial Precision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Role of Geometric Distortion. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.