A Comparative Study of the Boundary Control of Buck Converters Using First- and Second-Order Switching Surfaces -Part II: Discontinuous Conduction Mode

This paper extends the scope of the part-I companion paper on comparing the performance characteristics of buck converters with the first- (sigma1) and second-order (gamma2) switching surfaces. Major emphasis is given to converters operating in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). Similar to the companion paper, performance attributes under investigation in this paper includes the average output voltage, output ripple voltage, switching frequency, parametric sensitivities to the component values, and large-signal characteristics. Due to the presence of the output hysteresis band, an additional switching boundary formed by the zero-inductor-current trajectory is created. This phenomenon causes a shift of the operating point in converters with sigma1. Conversely, the operating point remains unchanged in converters with sigma2. As well as in continuous conduction mode (CCM), sigma can make the converter revert to the steady state in two switching cycles in DCM and gives better static and dynamic responses than sigma in both CCM and DCM. Most importantly, its control law and settings are the same in both modes. Experimental results of a prototype are found to be in good agreement with theoretical predictions

[1]  C. Q. Lee,et al.  Tracking control of buck converter using sliding-mode with adaptive hysteresis , 1995, Proceedings of PESC '95 - Power Electronics Specialist Conference.

[2]  M. Marchesoni,et al.  Experimental study of a power conditioning system using sliding mode control , 1996 .

[3]  G. Verghese,et al.  Nonlinear phenomena in power electronics : attractors, bifurcations, chaos, and nonlinear control , 2001 .

[4]  Philip T. Krein,et al.  Elements of Power Electronics , 1997 .

[5]  K.K.S. Leung,et al.  Use of second-order switching surface in the boundary control of buck converter , 2004, 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551).

[6]  K.K.S. Leung,et al.  Derivation of a second-order switching surface in the boundary control of buck converters , 2004, IEEE Power Electronics Letters.

[7]  R. Redl,et al.  Dynamic analysis of switching-mode DC/DC converters , 1991 .

[8]  Jiin-Chuan Wu,et al.  A ripple control buck regulator with fixed output frequency , 2003 .

[9]  P. Krein,et al.  Issues in boundary control [of power convertors] , 1996, PESC Record. 27th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[10]  M. F. Greuel,et al.  Design approaches to boundary controllers , 1997, PESC97. Record 28th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Formerly Power Conditioning Specialists Conference 1970-71. Power Processing and Electronic Specialists Conference 1972.

[11]  Y.M. Lai,et al.  On the practical design of a sliding mode voltage controlled buck converter , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[12]  H. Chung,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Boundary Control of Buck Converters Using First- and Second-Order Switching Surfaces -Part I: Continuous Conduction Mode , 2005, 2005 IEEE 36th Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[13]  Tore Undeland,et al.  Power Electronics: Converters, Applications and Design , 1989 .

[14]  P. Krein,et al.  Issues in Boundary Control , 1996 .

[15]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Nonlinear Phenomena in Power Electronics , 2001 .

[16]  B. R. Menezes,et al.  Analysis of switching frequency reduction methods applied to sliding mode controlled DC-DC converters , 1992, [Proceedings] APEC '92 Seventh Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition.