Ultrasound estimation of volume of pleural fluid in mechanically ventilated patients

ObjectiveThe aim was to develop a practical method for estimation of the volume of pleural effusion using ultrasonography in mechanically ventilated patients.DesignProspective observational study.Setting20-bed general intensive care unit in the university hospital.Patients and participants81 patients were included after initial suspicion of pleural fluid on chest supine X-ray and pre-puncture ultrasound confirming effusion. Patients with thoracic deformities, post-lung surgery, with diaphragm pathology, haemothorax, empyema and with incomplete aspiration of pleural fluid on post-puncture ultrasound were excluded.InterventionsPatients were supine with mild trunk elevation at 15°. Probe was moved upwards in posterior axillary line, and transverse section perpendicular to the body axis was obtained with pleural separation visible at lung base. The maximal distance between parietal and visceral pleura (Sep) in end-expiration was recorded. Thoracentesis was performed at previous probe position and volume of pleural fluid (V) recorded.Measurements and results92 effusions were evaluated and drained; 11 (12%) were excluded for incomplete aspiration. Success rate of obtaining fluid under ultrasound guidance was 100%; the incidence of pneumothorax or bleeding was zero. Mean Sep was 35 ± 13 mm. Mean V was 658 ± 320 ml. Significant positive correlation between both Sep and V was found: r = 0.72; r2 = 0.52; p < 0.001. The amount of pleural fluid volume can be estimated with the simplified formula: V (ml) = 20 × Sep (mm). Mean prediction error of V using Sep was 158.4 ± 160.6 ml.ConclusionsEasy quantification of pleural fluid may help to decide about performing thoracentesis in high-risk patients, although thoracentesis under ultrasound guidance appears to be a safe procedure.

[1]  Y Menu,et al.  A bedside ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax in the critically ill. Lung sliding. , 1995, Chest.

[2]  Phillip W. Jones,et al.  Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? , 2003, Chest.

[3]  P. Mayo,et al.  Safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. , 2004, Chest.

[4]  L. Papazian,et al.  Usefulness of ultrasonography in predicting pleural effusions > 500 mL in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. , 2005, Chest.

[5]  P. Preux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of pleural effusion in critically ill patients by means of ultrasonography* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[6]  D. Lichtenstein,et al.  Ultrasound diagnosis of alveolar consolidation in the critically ill , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  J. Hulot,et al.  Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-aided thoracentesis in mechanically ventilated patients , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[8]  K. Eibenberger,et al.  Quantification of pleural effusions: sonography versus radiography. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  L. Hydo,et al.  Beneficial effects of chest tube drainage of pleural effusion in acute respiratory failure refractory to positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation. , 1998, Surgery.

[10]  J. Savino,et al.  Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes after drainage of significant pleural effusions in critically ill, mechanically ventilated surgical patients. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  J. le Gall,et al.  Clinically documented pleural effusions in medical ICU patients: how useful is routine thoracentesis? , 2002, Chest.

[12]  Eleonora Carlesso,et al.  Physiologic rationale for ventilator setting in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[13]  S. Ayres,et al.  Textbook of Critical Care , 1996 .

[14]  G. Hedenstierna,et al.  CT-Assessment of Dependent Lung Densities in Man during General Anaesthesia , 1995, Acta radiologica.

[15]  M. Pratter,et al.  The evaluation of pleural effusion. , 1994, Chest.