When Less is More: Data and Power in Advertising Experiments

Yahoo! Research partnered with a nationwide retailer to study the effects of online display advertising on both online and in-store purchases. We use a randomized field experiment on 3 million Yahoo! users who are also past customers of the retailer. We find statistically significant evidence that the retailer ads increase sales 3.6% relative to the control group. We show that control ads boost measurement precision by identifying and removing the half of in-campaign sales data that is unaffected by the ads. Less data gives us 31% more precision in our estimates—equivalent to increasing our sample to 5.3 million users. By contrast, we only improve precision by 5% when we include additional covariate data to reduce the residual variance in our experimental regression. The covariate-adjustment strategy disappoints despite exceptional consumer-level data including demographics, ad exposure levels, and two years’ worth of past purchase history.

[1]  Bradley T. Shapiro,et al.  Positive Spillovers and Free Riding in Advertising of Prescription Pharmaceuticals: The Case of Antidepressants , 2016, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Catherine E. Tucker,et al.  When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising , 2013 .

[3]  Seth Stephens-Davidowitz,et al.  Super returns to Super Bowl ads? , 2017 .

[4]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  An Analysis of Real World TV Advertising Tests: A 15-Year Update , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  R. Bucklin,et al.  Effects of Internet Display Advertising in the Purchase Funnel: Model-Based Insights from a Randomized Field Experiment , 2015 .

[6]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities , 2011 .

[7]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  Which Products Are Best Suited to Mobile Advertising? A Field Study of Mobile Display Advertising Effects on Consumer Attitudes and Intentions , 2014 .

[8]  Randall A. Lewis,et al.  Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search , 2015 .

[9]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[10]  I. Executive An Evaluation of Methods Used to Assess the Effectiveness of Advertising on the Internet , 2010 .

[11]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Online ads and offline sales: measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! , 2014 .

[12]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the Returns to Advertising , 2014 .

[13]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Dynamics of Retail Advertising: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2007 .

[14]  Garrett A. Johnson Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Ad Effectiveness , 2015 .

[15]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2012 .

[16]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Advertising Experiments at the Campbell Soup Company , 1989 .

[17]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Here, there, and everywhere: correlated online behaviors can lead to overestimates of the effects of advertising , 2011, WWW.

[18]  Michael Sinkinson,et al.  Ask Your Doctor? Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals , 2015 .