Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage identification

Abstract Identification of structural parameters can be cast as the process of solving an inverse problem, in which regularization may be required when the problem is ill-posed. Bayesian inference provides a probabilistic interpretation of the regularization and yields a statistically stable/bounded solution. To this end, this paper presents a hierarchical Bayesian learning methodology with sensitivity analysis for identification of structural damage which has sparse characteristics. The proposed learning framework consists of two hierarchies: (1) the classical Bayesian learning and (2) the sparse Bayesian learning. Based on the incomplete modal quantities extracted from measurements such as the acceleration time histories, the classical Bayesian learning is utilized to update a parameterized baseline model followed by the sparse Bayesian learning which can accurately identify the sparsity of damage. The Bayesian learning procedures are formulated with the sensitivity analysis of model parameters, which compensate the linear truncation errors and produce accurate identification results through iterative optimization. The performance of the proposed approach has been illustrated through two numerical examples (a 10-story shear-type building and a 33-bar truss structure) and an experimental validation (a shake-table test of an 8-story frame). Results indicate that the proposed method is robust for structural damage identification even in the presence of high measurement noise and a limited number of sensor recordings. This hierarchical Bayesian learning approach is generally more efficient than classical regularization techniques such as the Tikhonov regularization.

[1]  James L. Beck,et al.  Hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning for structural health monitoring with incomplete modal data , 2014 .

[2]  Bin Xu,et al.  Structural parameters and dynamic loading identification from incomplete measurements: Approach and validation , 2012 .

[3]  K. Yuen Bayesian Methods for Structural Dynamics and Civil Engineering , 2010 .

[4]  Andreas Stavridis,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and propagation in dynamic models using ambient vibration measurements, application to a 10-story building , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[5]  Golam Kabir,et al.  Sewer Structural Condition Prediction Integrating Bayesian Model Averaging with Logistic Regression , 2018, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.

[6]  P. G. Bakir,et al.  Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm , 2007 .

[7]  Tshilidzi Marwala,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating Using Computational Intelligence Techniques: Applications to Structural Dynamics , 2010 .

[8]  Chan Ghee Koh,et al.  Modified genetic algorithm strategy for structural identification , 2006 .

[9]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching , 2006 .

[10]  Michael E. Tipping Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of the Phase II IASC–ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Experimental Benchmark Data , 2004 .

[12]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Simultaneous identification of bridge structural parameters and vehicle loads , 2015 .

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation , 2002 .

[14]  Oral Buyukozturk,et al.  Identification of traffic-induced nodal excitations of truss bridges through heterogeneous data fusion , 2015 .

[15]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[16]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Perspectives on Sparse Bayesian Learning , 2003, NIPS.

[17]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Bayesian Probabilistic Approach for Structure Damage Detection , 1997 .

[18]  J. Ching,et al.  Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Model Updating, Model Class Selection, and Model Averaging , 2007 .

[19]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Strain Energy and Hybrid Multiobjective Optimization , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[20]  Yong Huang,et al.  Bayesian system identification based on hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning and Gibbs sampling with application to structural damage assessment , 2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[21]  J. Beck Bayesian system identification based on probability logic , 2010 .

[22]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review , 2015 .

[23]  Jiuchao Feng,et al.  Real-time nonlinear structural system identification via iterated unscented Kalman filter , 2012 .

[24]  Patrick Paultre,et al.  Consistent regularization of nonlinear model updating for damage identification , 2009 .

[25]  Hossein Mobahi,et al.  A Bayesian State-Space Approach for Damage Detection and Classification , 2017 .

[26]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in the Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice , 2013 .

[27]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[28]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[29]  Li Zhou,et al.  An adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identification , 2006 .

[30]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non‐collocated heterogeneous sensing , 2009 .

[31]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo‐based Bayesian method for structural model updating and damage detection , 2018 .

[32]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Probabilistic updating of building models using incomplete modal data , 2016 .

[33]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification , 2016 .

[34]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Identification of Parametric Variations of Structures Based on Least Squares Estimation and Adaptive Tracking Technique , 2005 .

[35]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  A Bayesian Probabilistic Approach for Crack Characterization in Plate Structures , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[36]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Identification of Structural Systems using an Evolutionary Strategy , 2004 .

[37]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions , 1970, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[38]  Jisheng Dai,et al.  Source localization for sparse array using nonnegative sparse Bayesian learning , 2016, Signal Process..

[39]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Regularization Tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3 , 2007, Numerical Algorithms.

[40]  R. Fox,et al.  Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. , 1968 .

[41]  Hao Sun,et al.  Bayesian characterization of buildings using seismic interferometry on ambient vibrations , 2017 .

[42]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering , 2010 .

[43]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[44]  X. Y. Li,et al.  Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating , 2010 .

[45]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection for Hysteretic Structural Models Using Stochastic Simulation , 2008 .

[46]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification , 2015 .

[47]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fundamental two-stage formulation for Bayesian system identification, Part II: Application to ambient vibration data , 2016 .

[48]  M. Phan,et al.  Identification of observer/Kalman filter Markov parameters: Theory and experiments , 1993 .

[49]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[50]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating Using Evolutionary Strategy for Damage Detection , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[51]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  A Bayesian recursive framework for ball-bearing damage classification in rotating machinery , 2016 .

[52]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[53]  Yong Huang,et al.  Hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection: Theory, computation and application , 2017 .

[54]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Multiresolution Bayesian nonparametric general regression for structural model updating , 2018 .

[55]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Bayesian spectral density approach for modal updating using ambient data , 2001 .

[56]  Yang Liu,et al.  Statistical Regularization for Identification of Structural Parameters and External Loadings Using State Space Models , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[57]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Identification of structural models using a modified Artificial Bee Colony algorithm , 2013 .

[58]  Alireza Ture Savadkoohi,et al.  Finite element model updating of a semi‐rigid moment resisting structure , 2011 .

[59]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fundamental two-stage formulation for Bayesian system identification, Part I: General theory , 2016 .

[60]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating , 2015 .