Ecological footprints and development trends in Hefei, China

Purpose Because natural resource utilization is a predictor of sustainable development, an evaluation of the efficiency of resource utilization is critical for assessing developmental potentiality. The purpose of this paper is to apply three-dimensional (3D) ecological footprint theory to assess the effects of production and consumption on ecological systems in Hefei, China. Design/methodology/approach Using data for Hefei for the period 2005-2014, an ecological footprint model (EFM) was developed to calculate the area’s ecological footprint (EF), ecological carrying (EC) capacity and obtain two indices, namely, footprint depth and size. The relationship between economic development and natural resource utilization was subsequently evaluated based on the calculated ecological deficit and the EF demand per Renminbi 10,000 of gross domestic product (GDP). Findings Over the last decade, Hefei’s EF per capita evidenced a 9.87 percent growth rate, increasing from 1.16 hm2/person in 2005 to 2.70 hm2/person in 2014. EC capacity per capita increased from 0.21 hm2/person in 2005 to 0.36 hm2/person in 2014, evidencing a gradually increasing trend at an average annual growth rate of 6.24 percent. Thus, between 2005 and 2014, the ecological deficit increased annually by three times. The amplification of footprint depth significantly exceeded that of footprint size. Between 2005 and 2014, Hefei’s EF per capita Renminbi 10,000 of GDP decreased annually by 4.68 percent. Thus, energy consumption in Hefei exceeded the natural regeneration capacity of energy resources, with excessive development and resource utilization impacting on the regional ecological system. Practical implications The application of a 3D EFM sheds light on natural resource utilization within regional development. Moreover, footprint depth and size are significant predictors of the impacts of natural resource utilization. These findings will also benefit other countries or cities. Originality/value This is one of the first empirical studies to apply a 3D EFM to evaluate the relationship between natural resource utilization and economic development. Adopting a sustainable development framework, it provides insights into the effects of natural resource utilization in relation to the balance between the natural ecological system and economic development. This has far-reaching implications beyond Hefei and China.

[1]  G. Broman,et al.  A framework for strategic sustainable development , 2017 .

[2]  J. Lubchenco.  Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[3]  David W. Wright,et al.  INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[4]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Carrying capacity using emergy and a new calculation of the ecological footprint , 2016 .

[5]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Towards a 3D National Ecological Footprint Geography , 2011 .

[6]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Analysis of energy footprints associated with recycling of glass and plastic—case studies for industrial ecology , 2004 .

[7]  P. Meyfroidt.  Trade-Offs Between Environment and Livelihoods: Bridging the Global Land Use and Food Security Discussions , 2017 .

[8]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[9]  X. Miao,et al.  The Challenges of Reusing Mining and Mineral-Processing Wastes , 2012, Science.

[10]  Patrick A. Narbel,et al.  A Carbon Footprint Proportional to Expenditure - a Case for Norway? , 2014 .

[11]  G. Norris,et al.  How Social Footprints of Nations Can Assist in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals , 2017 .

[12]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Heavy metal sources and associated risk in response to agricultural intensification in the estuarine sediments of Chaohu Lake Valley, East China. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A research agenda for improving national Ecological Footprint accounts , 2009 .

[14]  Shushen Zhang,et al.  Food consumption and waste and the embedded carbon, water and ecological footprints of households in China. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges , 2004 .

[16]  Z. Heng.  A modified ecological footprint analysis to a sub-national area:the case study of Zhejiang Province , 2009 .

[17]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[18]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[19]  Chunyang He,et al.  Are the drylands in northern China sustainable? A perspective from ecological footprint dynamics from 1990 to 2010. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Rawshan Ara Begum,et al.  An empirical assessment of ecological footprint calculations for Malaysia , 2009 .

[21]  J. Solís-Guzmán,et al.  The ecological footprint of dwelling construction in Spain , 2015 .

[22]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  The Urban Funnel Model and the Spatially Heterogeneous Ecological Footprint , 2001, Ecosystems.

[23]  Fang Ka.  International comparison of natural capital use: A three-dimensional model optimization of ecological footprint , 2013 .

[24]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation , 2009 .

[25]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach , 2004 .

[26]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 , 2001 .

[27]  Marco Scotti,et al.  Ecological Footprint as a tool for local sustainability: The municipality of Piacenza (Italy) as a case study , 2009 .

[28]  S. Gössling,et al.  Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability , 2002 .

[29]  Sanderine Nonhebel,et al.  A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns , 2002 .

[30]  Robin Roy,et al.  Household ecological footprinting for active distance learning and challenge of personal lifestyles , 2002 .

[31]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability , 1996 .

[32]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[33]  Yong Geng,et al.  Urban ecological footprint analysis: a comparative study between Shenyang in China and Kawasaki in Japan , 2014 .

[34]  S. Morse,et al.  Resource Use and Deprivation: Geographical Analysis of the Ecological Footprint and Townsend Index for England , 2014 .

[35]  Guo Xiu.  Calculation and analysis of urban ecological footprint: a case study of Guangzhou , 2003 .

[36]  Heijungs Reinout.  A Review on Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model for Natural Capital Accounting , 2012 .

[37]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[38]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .