Quantifying Workers’ Hazard Identification Using Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory

Workers’ safety and health is a primary concern in the construction industry due to the significant number of occupational injuries and fatalities experienced. Previous research indicates that such injuries and fatalities are multicausal, and one of which may be workers drifting towards hazard. The purpose of this study was to develop a method to quantify the ability of construction workers to identify hazards such that this drifting can be minimized. The paper is not reporting on a specific finding regarding hazard identification ability amongst the population of workers surveyed in the research. Rather, it is a foray into a new method that augments assessment of hazard identification abilities of workers. This research applied a hybrid model, Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory (FSDT) to quantify workers’ ability to identify occupational hazards. Data was collected using a survey designed to assess construction workers’ perceptions of safety specific to the risk of fall accidents for structural steel workers. An eighteen-question survey was based on standards set by national safety agencies in the United States and on a mix of conditions that were with no violation, a complete violation, and a partial violation. Both the conventional Signal Detection Theory (SDT) and FSDT were used for analysis and the results were compared. The comparison of results indicated that the FSDT model provided a richer framework to study worker hazard perception on a construction site. The methodology is expected to provide guiding framework for similar studies. Increasing data collection of the type presented in this paper will enable refinement and revision of construction occupational safety and health regulations by national agencies.

[1]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Fuzzy signal detection theory: analysis of human and machine performance in air traffic control, and analytic considerations , 2003, Ergonomics.

[2]  John A. Gambatese Safety in a Designer's Hands , 2000 .

[3]  Carlos A. Vargas Investigating construction falls using fault tree analysis and developing a prototype tool to reduce falls using expert system and computer assisted instrution methods , 1998 .

[4]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[5]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Signal Detection Theory: Enabling Work Near the Edge , 2003 .

[6]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  SAFETY CLIMATE IN CONSTRUCTION SITE ENVIRONMENTS , 2002 .

[7]  Osama Abudayyeh,et al.  Mechanical Contracting Safety Issues , 2002 .

[8]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents , 2001 .

[9]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Role of designers in construction worker safety , 1992 .

[10]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  WORKING NEAR THE EDGE: A NEW APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION SAFETY , 2002 .

[11]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Moving toward a Zero Injury Objective , 2000 .

[12]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory: Basic Postulates and Formulas for Analyzing Human and Machine Performance , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[14]  Denise Gravitt,et al.  Construction Safety , 2013 .

[15]  John A. Swets,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers , 1996 .

[16]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Construction tools and equipment – their influence on accident causality , 2005 .

[17]  A. Roy Duff,et al.  Development of Causal Model of Construction Accident Causation , 2001 .

[18]  T. Michael Toole,et al.  Construction Site Safety Roles , 2002 .