Design of Curriculum Matrix for Robotics Education Derived from Bloom's Taxonomy and Educational Curriculum of 2013

Even though robotics have gaining an attention from students of every educational level since elementary school up to higher education, their impact in student’s education itself is still relatively small. Most of the robotics competitions in Indonesia are still focus on the result but not in the process. This paper presents an educational matrix of curriculum based on robotics which focused on the process and learning outcomes of the education. The proposed Curriculum Matrix is derived from Bloom's Taxonomy which synchronized with the Educational Curriculum of 2013 from the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. Hereafter, the activities of education are designed based the available robotics module together with the designed Curriculum Matrix. By using the Curriculum Matrix, the proportion of education activities can be evaluated to achieve the learning outcomes for the specified educational level more easily

[1]  Igor M. Verner,et al.  AN INTERNATIONAL VIEW OF ROBOTICS AS AN EDUCATIONAL MEDIUM , 2002 .

[2]  Norman Edward Gronlund,et al.  How to write and use instructional objectives , 1990 .

[3]  J. K. Archibald,et al.  Competitive robot soccer: a design experience for undergraduate students , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[4]  Kellah M. Edens.  Preparing Problem Solvers for the 21st Century through Problem-Based Learning , 2000 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[6]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[7]  Sondra Stein,et al.  Equipped for the Future Content Standards. What Adults Need To Know and Be Able To Do in the 21st Century. , 2000 .

[8]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[9]  Robert Frank Mager,et al.  Preparing instructional objectives : a critical tool in the development of effective instruction , 1997 .

[10]  Henrik Hautop Lund,et al.  Robotics as an educational tool , 1999 .

[11]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION III. DEVELOPING CRITICAL SKILLS , 2000 .

[12]  Andrew N. Hrymak,et al.  Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program , 1997 .

[13]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Technical school students design and develop robotic gear-based constructions for the transmission of motion , 2005 .

[14]  E. Simpson.  THE CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN. , 1966 .

[15]  Richard W. Morshead.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[16]  J. Johnson,et al.  Children, robotics, and education , 2003, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[17]  Lesta A. Burgess.  Essential Concepts of Engineering Design Curriculum in Secondary Technology Education , 2009 .

[18]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[19]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria , 2003 .