Relationship between plant hydraulic and biochemical properties derived from a steady‐state coupled water and carbon transport model

There is growing evidence that plant stomata have evolved physiological controls to satisfy the demand for CO 2 by photosynthesis while regulating water losses by leaves in a manner that does not cause cavitation in the soil‐root‐ xylem hydraulic system. Whether the hydraulic and biochemical properties of plants evolve independently or whether they are linked at a time scale relevant to plant stand development remains uncertain. To address this question, a steady-state analytical model was developed in which supply of CO 2 via the stomata and biochemical demand for CO 2 are constrained by the balance between loss of water vapour from the leaf to the atmosphere and supply of water from the soil to the leaf. The model predicts the intercellular CO 2 concentration ( C i ) for which the maximum demand for CO 2 is in equilibrium with the maximum hydraulically permissible supply of water through the soil‐ root‐xylem system. The model was then tested at two forest stands in which simultaneous hydraulic, ecophysiological, and long-term carbon isotope discrimination measurements were available. The model formulation reproduces analytically recent findings on the sensitivity of bulk stomatal conductance ( g s ) to vapour pressure deficit ( D ); namely, g s = g ref (1 − − − m × × × ln D ), where m is a sensitivity parameter and g ref is a reference conductance defined at D = 1 kPa. An immediate outcome of the model is an explicit relationship between maximum carboxylation capacity ( V cmax ) and soil‐plant hydraulic properties. It is shown that this relationship is consistent with measurements reported for conifer and rain forest angiosperm species. The analytical model predicts a decline in V cmax as the hydraulic capacity of the soil‐root‐xylem decreases with stand development or age.

[1]  Nicanor Z. Saliendra,et al.  Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis , 1995, Planta.

[2]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[3]  G. Katul,et al.  Hydrologic balance in an intact temperate forest ecosystem under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2002 .

[4]  G. Katul,et al.  Modelling the limits on the response of net carbon exchange to fertilization in a south-eastern pine forest , 2002 .

[5]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Temperature dependence of two parameters in a photosynthesis model , 2002 .

[6]  S. Linder,et al.  Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[7]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Relationships between hydraulic architecture and leaf photosynthetic capacity in nitrogen-fertilized Eucalyptus grandis trees. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[8]  G Goldstein,et al.  Water transport in trees: current perspectives, new insights and some controversies. , 2001, Environmental and experimental botany.

[9]  R. Oren,et al.  Estimating maximum mean canopy stomatal conductance for use in models , 2001 .

[10]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine , 2001 .

[11]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests , 2000 .

[12]  G. Katul,et al.  Modelling assimilation and intercellular CO2 from measured conductance: a synthesis of approaches , 2000 .

[13]  G. Katul,et al.  Modeling CO2 and water vapor turbulent flux distributions within a forest canopy , 2000 .

[14]  A. Nardini,et al.  Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? , 2000, Trees.

[15]  Variation in hydraulic architecture and gas-exchange in two desert sub-shrubs, Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.) and Ambrosia dumosa (Payne) , 2000, Oecologia.

[16]  J. Sperry,et al.  Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda , 2000 .

[17]  J. Sperry Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange , 2000 .

[18]  Ram Oren,et al.  Analyses of assumptions and errors in the calculation of stomatal conductance from sap flux measurements. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[19]  D. Ellsworth Seasonal CO(2) assimilation and stomatal limitations in a Pinus taeda canopy. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[20]  John Tenhunen,et al.  The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance , 2000 .

[21]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Influence of soil porosity on water use in Pinus taeda , 2000, Oecologia.

[22]  Nathan Phillips,et al.  Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit , 1999 .

[23]  Cheng-I Hsieh,et al.  Spatial Variability of Turbulent Fluxes in the Roughness Sublayer of an Even-Aged Pine Forest , 1999 .

[24]  Allen,et al.  Stand-level allometry in Pinus taeda as affected by irrigation and fertilization. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[25]  B. Bond,et al.  Stomatal behavior of four woody species in relation to leaf-specific hydraulic conductance and threshold water potential. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[26]  B. Ewers,et al.  CARRY-OVER EFFECTS OF WATER AND NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON WATER USE OF PINUS TAEDA , 1999 .

[27]  D. Ellsworth CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? , 1999 .

[28]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[29]  G. Katul,et al.  WATER BALANCE DELINEATES THE SOIL LAYER IN WHICH MOISTURE AFFECTS CANOPY CONDUCTANCE , 1998 .

[30]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf Area and Above- and Belowground Growth Responses of Loblolly Pine to Nutrient and Water Additions , 1998, Forest Science.

[31]  C. Lovisolo,et al.  Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. , 1998 .

[32]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model , 1998 .

[33]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective , 1998 .

[34]  H. Jones Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration , 1998 .

[35]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Hydraulic Limits to Tree Height and Tree Growth , 1997 .

[36]  R. Leuning Scaling to a common temperature improves the correlation between the photosynthesis parameters Jmax and Vcmax , 1997 .

[37]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  Age-Related Decline in Forest Productivity: Pattern and Process , 1997 .

[38]  N. Livingston,et al.  Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] and alder [Alnus rubra (Bong)] seedlings , 1996 .

[39]  Albert Olioso,et al.  Simulation of diurnal transpiration and photosynthesis of a water stressed soybean crop , 1996 .

[40]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus-Acer stand at Harvard Forest : the regulation of stomatal conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties , 1996 .

[41]  R. Leuning A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[42]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentrations in plants , 1995 .

[43]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Evidence of Reduced Photosynthetic Rates in Old Trees , 1994, Forest Science.

[44]  E. Schulze,et al.  Relationships among Maximum Stomatal Conductance, Ecosystem Surface Conductance, Carbon Assimilation Rate, and Plant Nitrogen Nutrition: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise , 1994 .

[45]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon and Water Relations in Desert Plants: An Isotopic Perspective , 1993 .

[46]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[47]  G. Campbell Simulation of water uptake by plant roots. , 1991 .

[48]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity* , 1990 .

[49]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Modelling Stomatal Behaviour and and Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis , 1990 .

[50]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[51]  A. Tyree,et al.  Vulnerability of Xylem to Cavitation and Embolism , 1989 .

[52]  J. Sperry,et al.  Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? : answers from a model. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[53]  J. Norman SIMULATION OF MICROCLIMATES , 1982 .

[54]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[55]  C. Black,et al.  Effects of Atmospheric Saturation Deficit on the Stomatal Conductance of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) , 1979 .

[56]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties , 1978 .

[57]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[58]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. , 1977, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.