The EU strategy for solving the DEMO exhaust problem

Abstract Exhaust of power and particles is crucial for the DEMO device and the EU has developed a strategy to address the challenges. This strategy consists of a conventional approach based on extrapolation of the ITER solution (detached lower single null divertor) as well as the development of alternatives as risk mitigation. These comprise alternative magnetic divertor geometry, liquid metal targets and intrinsically ELM-free operational scenarios. On the experimental side, the EUROfusion programme has initiated both upgrades to existing linear and toroidal devices as well as plans to engage in new devices presently under construction in the EU. In parallel, the theory and modelling efforts are ramped up in a targeted effort to obtain the necessary understanding for safe extrapolation to DEMO. This is especially important for the alternatives, which cannot be tested in ITER.

[1]  J. Stober,et al.  Parameter dependences of small edge localized modes (ELMs) , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[2]  B. P. Duval,et al.  Results from recent detachment experiments in alternative divertor configurations on TCV , 2017 .

[3]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Real-time feedback control of the impurity emission front in tokamak divertor plasmas , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  C. Giroud,et al.  Peculiarity of highly radiating multi-impurity seeded H-mode plasmas on JET with ITER-like wall , 2020, Physica Scripta.

[5]  Influence of CX-reactions on the radiation in the pedestal region at ASDEX Upgrade , 2020 .

[6]  Kai Nordlund,et al.  European Research Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy , 2018 .

[7]  Z. Vizvary,et al.  Impact of plasma thermal transients on the design of the EU DEMO first wall protection , 2020 .

[8]  A. Vertkov,et al.  Calculation and experimental investigation of fusion reactor divertor plate and first wall protection by capillary-pore systems with lithium , 1999 .

[9]  B. Lipschultz,et al.  Sensitivity of detachment extent to magnetic configuration and external parameters , 2016 .

[10]  O. Sauter,et al.  L-mode-edge negative triangularity tokamak reactor , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[11]  W. Treutterer,et al.  Simulation of burn control for DEMO using ASTRA coupled with Simulink , 2017 .

[12]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[13]  T. Osborne,et al.  The effect of plasma shape and neutral beam mix on the rotation threshold for RMP-ELM suppression , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[14]  J. Schweinzer,et al.  Optimized tokamak power exhaust with double radiative feedback in ASDEX Upgrade , 2012 .

[15]  A. Kallenbach,et al.  X-point radiation, its control and an ELM suppressed radiating regime at the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[16]  Tomonori Takizuka,et al.  Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER , 2008 .

[17]  H. Greuner,et al.  High-heat-flux technologies for the European demo divertor targets: State-of-the-art and a review of the latest testing campaign , 2021 .

[18]  D. Ruzic,et al.  A distillation column for hydrogen isotope removal from liquid lithium , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[19]  N. Cardozo,et al.  Liquid metals as a divertor plasma-facing material explored using the Pilot-PSI and Magnum-PSI linear devices , 2017 .

[20]  J. Contributors,et al.  Power exhaust by SOL and pedestal radiation at ASDEX Upgrade and JET , 2017 .

[21]  W. Treutterer,et al.  Preliminary analysis of alternative divertors for DEMO , 2021 .

[22]  P. Vondracek,et al.  Conceptual design of the COMPASS upgrade tokamak , 2017 .

[23]  K. Burrell,et al.  Advances towards QH-mode viability for ELM-stable operation in ITER , 2011 .

[24]  T. Eich,et al.  Inter-ELM power decay length for JET and ASDEX upgrade: measurement and comparison with heuristic drift-based model. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[25]  T. Rhodes,et al.  Achievement of Reactor-Relevant Performance in Negative Triangularity Shape in the DIII-D Tokamak. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[26]  A. Hubbard,et al.  Studies of EDA H-Mode in Alcator C-Mod , 2000 .

[27]  Y. Camenen,et al.  Impact of plasma triangularity and collisionality on electron heat transport in TCV L-mode plasmas , 2007 .

[28]  V. Rozhansky,et al.  Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor , 2019, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[29]  B. Duval,et al.  TCV experiments towards the development of a plasma exhaust solution , 2017 .

[30]  T. Eich,et al.  Effect of resonant magnetic perturbations on low collisionality discharges in MAST and a comparison with ASDEX Upgrade , 2014, 1412.7631.

[31]  V. Bobkov,et al.  Experimental conditions to suppress edge localised modes by magnetic perturbations in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[32]  T. Lunt,et al.  Assessment of alternative divertor configurations as an exhaust solution for DEMO , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[33]  R. Churchill,et al.  Multi-device studies of pedestal physics and confinement in the I-mode regime , 2016 .

[34]  B. Duval,et al.  Divertor closure effects on the TCV boundary plasma , 2021, Nuclear Materials and Energy.

[35]  Raffaele Albanese,et al.  The DTT device: Role and objectives , 2017 .

[36]  R. Neu,et al.  DEMO divertor limitations during and in between ELMs , 2014 .

[37]  J. Stober,et al.  Stationary ELM-free H-mode in ASDEX Upgrade , 2020 .

[38]  R. Neu,et al.  Deuterium retention in solid and liquid tin after low-temperature plasma exposure , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[39]  P. Rindt,et al.  Deuterium retention in Sn-filled samples exposed to fusion-relevant flux plasmas , 2020, Nuclear Fusion.

[40]  R. Goldston,et al.  The lithium vapor box divertor , 2015 .