Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory

Many everyday tasks require prioritizing some visual features over competing ones, both during the selection from the rich sensory input and while maintaining information in visual short-term memory (VSTM). Here, we show that observers can change priorities in VSTM when, initially, they attended to a different feature. Observers reported from memory the orientation of one of two spatially interspersed groups of black and white gratings. Using colored pre-cues (presented before stimulus onset) and retro-cues (presented after stimulus offset) predicting the to-be-reported group, we manipulated observers’ feature priorities independently during stimulus encoding and maintenance, respectively. Valid pre-cues reliably increased observers’ performance (reduced guessing, increased report precision) as compared to neutral ones; invalid pre-cues had the opposite effect. Valid retro-cues also consistently improved performance (by reducing random guesses), even if the unexpected group suddenly became relevant (invalid-valid condition). Thus, feature-based attention can reshape priorities in VSTM protecting information that would otherwise be forgotten.

[1]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Are There Multiple Visual Short-Term Memory Stores? , 2008, PloS one.

[2]  V. Lamme,et al.  Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[4]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[5]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Compte,et al.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[8]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory , 2016, Memory & Cognition.

[12]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[13]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Tal Makovski,et al.  Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Masud Husain,et al.  The privileged role of location in visual working memory , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2015 .

[18]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Harnessing naturally occurring data to measure the response of spending to income , 2014, Science.

[19]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[21]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  From Distributed Resources to Limited Slots in Multiple-Item Working Memory: A Spiking Network Model with Normalization , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  George A Alvarez,et al.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Nobre,et al.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  I. A. Clark,et al.  Attention Restores Discrete Items to Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[27]  Anna Christina Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention to locations in mental representations , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S. Luck,et al.  Sudden Death and Gradual Decay in Visual Working Memory , 2009, Psychological science.

[29]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  Feature-based attention enhances performance by increasing response gain , 2011, Vision Research.