Spatial interference between attended items engenders serial visual processing

A pair of experiments investigated the architecture of visual processing, parallel versus serial, across high and low levels of spatial interference in a divided attention task. Subjects made speeded judgments that required them to attend to a pair of color-cued objects among gray filler items, with the spatial proximity between the attended items varied to manipulate the strength of interference between attended items. Systems factorial analysis (Townsend & Nozawa, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39:321-359, 1995) was used to identify processing architecture. Experiment 1, using moderately dense displays, found evidence of parallel processing whether attended objects were in low or high proximity to one another. Experiment 2, using higher-density displays, found evidence of parallel selection when attended stimuli were widely separated but serial processing when they were in high proximity. Divided visual attention can operate in parallel under conditions of low or moderate spatial interference between selected items, but strong interference engenders serial processing.

[1]  J. Townsend,et al.  Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Songmei Han,et al.  Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque , 1979, Brain Research.

[5]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Binding is a local problem for natural objects and scenes , 2005, Vision Research.

[6]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[7]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Parallel processing in a multifeature whole-report paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Target Salience in Crowding , 2005, Perception.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Visual Feature Binding Requires Reentry , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Thiele,et al.  Attention alters spatial integration in macaque V1 in an eccentricity-dependent manner , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[16]  S. Yantis,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[19]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[20]  R. Desimone.  Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[22]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  M. Banich.  The Missing Link: The Role of Interhemispheric Interaction in Attentional Processing , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  J. Todd,et al.  The effects of viewing angle, camera angle, and sign of surface curvature on the perception of three-dimensional shape from texture. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  S. Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[27]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Independent encoding of colors and shapes from two stimuli , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[31]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Switching or sharing in dual-task line-length discrimination? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. McCarley,et al.  Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual attention and the binding problem: A neurophysiological perspective , 1998 .

[34]  J. R. Mounts.  Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  J. R. Mounts,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[38]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[40]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[41]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[42]  Jeffrey R W Mounts,et al.  Competitive interaction degrades target selection: an ERP study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[44]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[46]  Mario Fifić,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[48]  H. C. Hughes,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in the human oculomotor system: bimodal integration and express saccades , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[49]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Laurence T Maloney,et al.  Detection of light transformations and concomitant changes in surface albedo. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[51]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.

[52]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  J. Townsend,et al.  NIH Public Access Author Manuscript , 2006 .

[54]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[58]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Serial Attention Mechanisms in Visual Search: A Direct Behavioral Demonstration , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[62]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel selfterminating process in simple visual search tasks , 1975 .

[63]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Modeling Visual Attention via Selective Tuning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[64]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  H. Pashler,et al.  Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search , 2005, Cognition.

[66]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[67]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[68]  A. Treisman.  The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[69]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Timing divided attention. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Attention and Sensory Gain Control: A Peripheral Visual Process? , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity , 1994 .

[76]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The different stages of visual recognition need different attentional binding strategies , 2008, Brain Research.

[77]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[78]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks , 1983, Psychological research.

[79]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[80]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[81]  J. Wolfe.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[83]  Jason S McCarley,et al.  Localized Attentional Interference Affects Object Individuation, Not Feature Detection , 2007, Perception.

[84]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[85]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[86]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[87]  D. Meyer,et al.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[88]  J. McCarley,et al.  Age-related differences in localized attentional interference. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[89]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[90]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Spatially mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[92]  J. McCarley,et al.  Age, clutter, and competitive selection. , 2012, Psychology and aging.

[93]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[94]  G. Caputo,et al.  Attentional selection by distractor suppression , 1998, Vision Research.

[95]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[96]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The statistical properties of the Survivor Interaction Contrast , 2010 .

[97]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[99]  Brandon E Gavett,et al.  The role of salience in localized attentional interference , 2004, Vision Research.

[100]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4 , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[101]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[102]  James T Townsend,et al.  Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[103]  Kyongje Sung,et al.  Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.