Modulation of Spatial Orientation Processing by Mental Imagery Instructions: A MEG Study of Representational Momentum

Under appropriate conditions, an observer's memory for the final position of an abruptly halted moving object is distorted in the direction of the represented motion. This phenomenon is called representational momentum (RM). We examined the effect of mental imagery instructions on the modulation of spatial orientation processing by testing for RM under conditions of picture versus body rotation perception and imagination. Behavioral data were gathered via classical reaction time and error measurements, whereas brain activity was recorded with the help of magnetoence-phalography (MEG). Due to the so-called inverse problem and to signal complexity, results were described at the signal level rather than with the source location modeling. Brain magnetic field strength and spatial distribution, as well as latency of P200m evoked fields were used as neurocognitive markers. A task was devised where a subject examined a rotating sea horizon as seen from a virtual boat in order to extrapolate either the picture motion or the body motion relative to the picture while the latter disappeared temporarily until a test-view was displayed as a final orientation candidate. Results suggest that perceptual interpretation and extrapolation of visual motion in the roll plane capitalize on the fronto-parietal cortical networks involving working memory processes. Extrapolation of the rotational dynamics of sea horizon revealed a RM effect simulating the role of gravity in rotational equilibrium. Modulation of the P200m component reflected spatial orientation processing and a non-voluntary detection of an incongruity between displayed and expected final orientations given the implied motion. Neuromagnetic properties of anticipatory (Contingent Magnetic Variation) and evoked (P200m) brain magnetic fields suggest, respectively, differential allocation of attentional resources by mental imagery instructions (picture vs. body tilt), and a communality of neural structures (in the right centro-parietal region) for the control of both RM and mental rotation processes. Finally, the RM of the body motion is less prone to forward shifts than that of picture motion evidencing an internalization of the implied mass of the virtual body of the observer.

[1]  E Pfeifer,et al.  A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[3]  M. Petrides,et al.  Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Loomis,et al.  Reproduction of Object Shape is More Accurate without the Continued Availability of Visual Information , 1998, Perception.

[5]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[6]  R A Finke,et al.  Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  R Salmelin,et al.  Information processing in the human brain: magnetoencephalographic approach. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Salenius,et al.  Roles of attention, memory, and motor preparation in modulating human brain activity in a spatial working memory task. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  The magnetic counterpart of the contingent negative variation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  H Suzuki,et al.  Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion , 1997, Neuroreport.

[12]  H. White,et al.  Representational-Momentum Effects in the Cerebral Hemispheres , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  L Deecke,et al.  Planning, preparation, execution, and imagery of volitional action. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[18]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in studies of human cognitive brain function , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[21]  A. Crawley,et al.  Functional MRI of lateral occipitotemporal cortex during pursuit and motion perception , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[22]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  The information processing structure of the subjective vertical. A cybernetic bridge between its psychophysics and its neurobiology , 1988 .

[23]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Mental Rotation Studied by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging at High Field (4 Tesla): Performance and Cortical Activation , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Hubbard Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[25]  R. Finke,et al.  Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  P. Rossini,et al.  Neuromagnetic localization of the late component of the contingent negative variation. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Jörg Beringer,et al.  ERTS: A flexible software tool for developing and running psychological reaction time experiments on IBM PCs , 1994 .

[28]  N. Stucchi,et al.  Viewer- and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  L. McEvoy,et al.  High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[31]  M J Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Mechanisms and models of se-lective attention , 1995 .

[33]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Dissociation of human mid-dorsolateral from posterior dorsolateral frontal cortex in memory processing. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  P. Roland,et al.  Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  M. Denis,et al.  Reopening the Mental Imagery Debate: Lessons from Functional Anatomy , 1998, NeuroImage.

[38]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[39]  E. Moser,et al.  Magnetoencephalography May Help to Improve Functional MRI Brain Mapping , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.