The accuracy of beat-interval based algorithms for detecting atrial fibrillation

Automated detection of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) remains a challenge. Some have suggested that a major source of false positives from R-R interval based AF algorithms are ectopic beats and/or other supraventricular arrhythmias. However, this has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of four commonly implemented R-R Interval based AF algorithms (1) The coefficient of variance, (2) Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences, (3) Turning Point Ratio (TPR) and (4) Shannon Entropy. All four algorithms were tested on R-R interval data from patients in normal sinus rhythm, during atrial fibrillation, with ectopic beats and with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the performance of each algorithm over different analysis segment lengths ranging from 30 to 120 beats. When comparing algorithm results, a clear reduction in algorithm performance was found in patients with ectopic beats and SVT. This must be taken into consideration when designing and evaluating algorithms for automated AF detection.

[2]  Sheng Lu,et al.  Automatic Real Time Detection of Atrial Fibrillation , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  G.B. Moody,et al.  The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database , 2001, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[4]  G. Ng,et al.  Treating patients with ventricular ectopic beats , 2006, Heart.

[5]  Gustavo Saposnik,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke: Predicting Response to Thrombolysis and Clinical Outcomes , 2013, Stroke.

[6]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[7]  Á. Alonso,et al.  A rising tide: the global epidemic of atrial fibrillation. , 2014, Circulation.

[8]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[9]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews , 1994 .

[10]  Emma Pickwell-MacPherson,et al.  Automatic online detection of atrial fibrillation based on symbolic dynamics and Shannon entropy , 2014, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[11]  M. Márquez,et al.  Common electrocardiographic artifacts mimicking arrhythmias in ambulatory monitoring. , 2002, American heart journal.

[12]  Vaidotas Marozas,et al.  Detection of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  T. Coleman,et al.  Accuracy of methods for diagnosing atrial fibrillation using 12-lead ECG: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients Who Have Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  黄亚明 PhysioBank , 2009 .

[16]  L Glass,et al.  Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation using the coefficient of variation and density histograms of RR and ΔRR intervals , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  Juan Pablo Martínez,et al.  QRS detectors performance comparison in public databases , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[18]  R G Mark,et al.  Improved detection and classification of arrhythmias in noise-corrupted electrocardiograms using contextual information , 1990, [1990] Proceedings Computers in Cardiology.

[19]  J. Mant,et al.  How can we best detect atrial fibrillation? , 2012, The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

[20]  Ikaro Silva,et al.  Robust detection of heart beats in multimodal data , 2015, Physiological measurement.