Laser vaporization of bovine prostate: a quantitative comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate and lithium triborate lasers.

PURPOSE We compared the outcomes of in vitro vaporization of bovine prostate using the lithium triborate GreenLight HPS and the GreenLight KTP PV photoselective vaporization laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 96 specimens of bovine prostate tissue in saline at 20C were vaporized with a 2-dimensional scanning system using a side firing fiber emitting a 532 nm wavelength at 80 W using the KTP laser, and at 80 and 120 W using the HPS laser at a working distance of 0.5 to 5 mm and a treatment speed of 2 to 8 mm per second. Dimensions of the vaporized tissue and resultant lesions were assessed. RESULTS At a minimum working distance of 0.5 mm and a treatment speed of 4 mm per second (determined by optimum vaporization volume/energy use) the HPS laser at 80 and 120 W vaporized 50% and 100% more tissue, respectively, than the KTP laser at the customary 80 W. At the same treatment speed the HPS laser vaporized equally efficiently at up to 3 mm working distance at each power level, whereas the KTP laser lost efficiency at working distances beyond 0.5 mm. The 2 lasers vaporized more tissue at slower (longer lasing) treatment speeds but even at the slowest treatment speed mean thickness of the coagulation zone with the HPS laser at 80 and 120 W was comparable to that of the 80 W KTP laser (0.80 and 1.07 mm, respectively, vs 0.81). CONCLUSIONS In vitro the lithium triborate GreenLight HPS 120 W laser vaporizes bovine prostate far more efficiently than the KTP photoselective vaporization laser but coagulates it equally well. These favorable outcomes must be validated in vivo.

[1]  D. Bostwick,et al.  High-power (60-watt) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy in living canines and in human and canine cadavers. , 1997, Urology.

[2]  R. Malek Photoselective KTP Laser Vaporization of Obstructive BPH (PVP) , 2006 .

[3]  T. Gasser,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. , 2007, European urology.

[4]  J. Kabalin,et al.  Holmium:YAG laser prostatectomy canine feasibility study , 1996, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[5]  C. Stief,et al.  In-vitro comparison of the tissue vaporisation capabilities of different lasers , 2008 .

[6]  Kurt Lehmann,et al.  Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. , 2005, European urology.

[7]  D. M. Barrett,et al.  Photoselective potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the benign obstructive prostate: observations on long-term outcomes. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[8]  O. Reich,et al.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: the basel experience after 108 procedures. , 2005, European urology.

[9]  A. Welch,et al.  Definitions and Overview of Tissue Optics , 2010 .

[10]  K. Sarıca,et al.  Photoselective vaporization of the enlarged prostate with KTP laser: long-term results in 240 patients. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[11]  R. Sroka,et al.  [Diode laser. Ex vivo studies on vaporization and coagulation characteristics]. , 2007, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[12]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate: a comparative functional and pathologic study in canines. , 1996, Urology.

[13]  S. Kaplan,et al.  High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective laser vaporization of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates. , 2004, Urology.

[14]  D. M. Barrett,et al.  High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP/532) laser vaporization prostatectomy: 24 hours later. , 1998, Urology.

[15]  R. Griffiths,et al.  A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[16]  D. Bouchier-Hayes Photoselective vaporization of the prostate – towards a new standard , 2007, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[17]  Ashleyj . Welch,et al.  Optical-Thermal Response of Laser-Irradiated Tissue , 1995 .

[18]  Tullio Sulser,et al.  High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[19]  P. Alken,et al.  980-nm Diode laser: a novel laser technology for vaporization of the prostate. , 2007, European urology.

[20]  G. Muir,et al.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate laser in men with prostates of >100 mL , 2007, BJU international.

[21]  U. Nseyo,et al.  Impact of prostate‐specific antigen level and prostate volume as predictors of efficacy in photoselective vaporization prostatectomy: analysis and results of an ongoing prospective multicentre study at 3 years , 2006, BJU international.

[22]  D. M. Barrett,et al.  High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.