The Use of Argument Maps as an Assessment Tool in Higher Education

[1]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impacts of Computer Technology on the Worklife of Information Workers , 1990 .

[3]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[4]  Winston M. Tellis,et al.  APPLICATION OF A CASE STUDY METHODOLOGY , 1997 .

[5]  Winston Tellis,et al.  Introduction to Case Study , 1997 .

[6]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[7]  P. Klaczynski.  Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision-making. , 2001, Child development.

[8]  D. Suthers,et al.  “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry , 2002 .

[9]  D. Suthers.  Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. , 2003 .

[10]  Yair Neuman.  Go ahead, prove that God does not exist! On high school students’ ability to deal with fallacious arguments , 2003 .

[11]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[12]  Charles R. Twardy.  Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking , 2004 .

[13]  Chris Reed,et al.  Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[14]  T. Gelder.  Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science , 2005 .

[15]  S. Simon,et al.  Mapping Children’s Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation , 2006 .

[16]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Identification of Informal Reasoning Fallacies as a Function of Epistemological Level, Grade Level, and Cognitive Ability. , 2006 .

[17]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Representational Tools in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation-Based Learning: How Dyads Work With Constructed and Inspected Argumentative Diagrams , 2007 .

[19]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Collaborative Learning Through Chat Discussions and Argument Diagrams in Secondary School , 2007 .

[20]  Chris Reed,et al.  Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence , 2007, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[21]  The rationale for RationaleTM , 2007 .

[22]  B. Schwarz,et al.  What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation? , 2007 .

[23]  Henry Prakken,et al.  The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[24]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .

[25]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Arguing on the computer: a microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. , 2008, Child development.

[26]  A. Okada,et al.  Evidence‐based Dialogue Maps as a research tool to investigate the quality of school pupils’ scientific argumentation , 2008 .

[27]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills? , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[28]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Defeasible reasoning and informal fallacies , 2011, Synthese.

[30]  M. Baker.  Argumentative Interactions and the Social Construction of Knowledge , 2009 .

[31]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[32]  William Goodwin.  The ‘Passes-For’ Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking , 2010 .

[33]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[34]  D. Walton.  Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments than They Are , 2010 .

[35]  E. Nussbaum,et al.  Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education , 2011 .

[36]  D. Walton.  Defeasible Reasoning and Informal Fallacies , 2011 .

[37]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argument Mining by Applying Argumentation Schemes , 2012 .

[38]  Trudie Aberdeen.  Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[39]  C. P. Dwyer,et al.  An examination of the effects of argument mapping on students' memory and comprehension performance , 2013 .

[40]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams , 2014 .

[41]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The Negotiation of Meaning in Epistemic Situations , 2015, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[42]  D. Walton,et al.  Identifying paralogisms in two ethnically different contexts at university level / Identificación de paralogismos en dos contextos universitarios diferenciados étnicamente , 2016 .