The Finite Cell Method: A Higher Order Fictitious Domain Approach for Wave Propagation Analysis in Heterogeneous Structures

In this chapter a recently developed novel approach to simulate the propagation of ultrasonic guided waves in heterogeneous, especially cellular lightweight structures is presented. One of the most important drawbacks of traditional finite element-based approaches is the need for a geometry-conforming discretization. It is generally acknowledged that the mesh generation process constitutes the bottleneck in the current simulation pipeline. Therefore, different measures have been taken to at least alleviate the meshing bruden. One of these attempts is the finite cell method (FCM). It combines the advantages known from higher order finite element methods (FEM; exponential convergence rates) with those of fictitious domain methods (FDM; automatic mesh generation using Cartesian grids). In the framework of the FCM we do not rely on body-fitted discretizations and therefore shift the effort typically required for the mesh generation to the numerical integration of the system matrices which is performed by means of an adaptive Gaussian quadrature. The advantage of such a procedure in the context of wave propagation analysis is seen in the fully automated analysis process. Consequently, hardly any user input is required making the simulation very robust. Notwithstanding, it can be mathematically proven that the optimal rates of convergence are retained.

[1]  Ernst Rank,et al.  An efficient integration technique for the voxel‐based finite cell method , 2012 .

[2]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Using the finite cell method to predict crack initiation in ductile materials , 2014 .

[3]  I. Babuska,et al.  Finite Element Analysis , 2021 .

[4]  A. Patera A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: Laminar flow in a channel expansion , 1984 .

[5]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The Finite Cell Method for linear thermoelasticity , 2012, Comput. Math. Appl..

[6]  Alexander Düster,et al.  Finite and spectral cell method for wave propagation in heterogeneous materials , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[7]  Xiao-Wei Gao,et al.  The radial integration method for evaluation of domain integrals with boundary-only discretization , 2002 .

[8]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation: II. Three-dimensional models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation , 2002 .

[10]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  The finite cell method for tetrahedral meshes , 2016 .

[11]  E. Rank,et al.  The FCM compared to the h-version FEM for elasto-plastic problems , 2014 .

[12]  Sascha Duczek,et al.  Higher order finite elements and the fictitious domain concept for wave propagation analysis , 2014 .

[13]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  The tetrahedral finite cell method for fluids: Immersogeometric analysis of turbulent flow around complex geometries , 2016 .

[14]  Hans-Georg Sehlhorst Numerical homogenization strategies for cellular materials with applications in structural mechanics , 2011 .

[15]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  The finite cell method for polygonal meshes: poly-FCM , 2016, Computational Mechanics.

[16]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[17]  Alexander Düster,et al.  Non-standard bone simulation: interactive numerical analysis by computational steering , 2011, Comput. Vis. Sci..

[18]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Efficient and accurate numerical quadrature for immersed boundary methods , 2015, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Image-based goal-oriented adaptive isogeometric analysis with application to the micro-mechanical modeling of trabecular bone , 2015 .

[20]  F. Kummer,et al.  Highly accurate surface and volume integration on implicit domains by means of moment‐fitting , 2013 .

[21]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for the J2 flow theory of plasticity , 2013 .

[22]  L. Kudela,et al.  Highly Accurate Subcell Integration in the Context of The Finite Cell Method , 2013 .

[23]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Finite cell method compared to h-version finite element method for elasto-plastic problems , 2014 .

[24]  Alexander Düster,et al.  Numerical analysis of Lamb waves using the finite and spectral cell methods , 2014 .

[25]  Dominik Schillinger,et al.  The Finite Cell Method: A Review in the Context of Higher-Order Structural Analysis of CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models , 2015 .

[26]  Mark G. Blyth,et al.  A Lobatto interpolation grid over the triangle , 2006 .

[27]  Tom Lyche,et al.  Analysis-aware modeling: Understanding quality considerations in modeling for isogeometric analysis , 2010 .

[28]  Ernst Rank,et al.  From geometric design to numerical analysis: A direct approach using the Finite Cell Method on Constructive Solid Geometry , 2017, Comput. Math. Appl..

[29]  Y. Bazilevs,et al.  Weakly enforced essential boundary conditions for NURBS‐embedded and trimmed NURBS geometries on the basis of the finite cell method , 2013 .

[30]  G. Paulino,et al.  PolyMesher: a general-purpose mesh generator for polygonal elements written in Matlab , 2012 .

[31]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  The tetrahedral finite cell method: Higher‐order immersogeometric analysis on adaptive non‐boundary‐fitted meshes , 2016 .

[32]  Carlo Cattani,et al.  Boundary integration over linear polyhedra , 1990, Comput. Aided Des..

[33]  Jörg Peters,et al.  Computing moments of objects enclosed by piecewise polynomial surfaces , 1998, TOGS.

[34]  A. Edelman,et al.  Mesh generation for implicit geometries , 2005 .

[35]  M. Hematiyan A General Method for Evaluation of 2D and 3D Domain Integrals Without Domain Discretization and its Application in BEM , 2007 .

[36]  Y. Bazilevs,et al.  Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method , 2012 .

[37]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[38]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  An accurate, robust, and easy-to-implement method for integration over arbitrary polyhedra: Application to embedded interface methods , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[39]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Theoretical and Numerical Investigation of the Finite Cell Method , 2015, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[40]  Haoxiang Luo,et al.  A Lobatto interpolation grid in the tetrahedron , 2006 .

[41]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Applying the hp–d version of the FEM to locally enhance dimensionally reduced models , 2007 .

[42]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  Generalized finite element methods for three-dimensional structural mechanics problems , 2000 .

[43]  Alexander Düster,et al.  Local enrichment of the finite cell method for problems with material interfaces , 2013 .

[44]  Ralf-Peter Mundani,et al.  A Review of the Finite Cell Method for Nonlinear Structural Analysis of Complex CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models , 2018, 1807.01285.

[45]  N. Sukumar,et al.  Numerical integration of polynomials and discontinuous functions on irregular convex polygons and polyhedrons , 2011 .

[46]  J. P. Moitinho de Almeida,et al.  A SET OF HYBRID EQUILIBRIUM FINITE ELEMENT MODELS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SOLIDS , 1996 .

[47]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[48]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Eurographics/ Acm Siggraph Symposium on Computer Animation (2008) Flexible Simulation of Deformable Models Using Discontinuous Galerkin Fem , 2022 .

[49]  W. Ostachowicz,et al.  Guided Waves in Structures for SHM: The Time - domain Spectral Element Method , 2012 .

[50]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  The finite and spectral cell methods for smart structure applications: transient analysis , 2015 .

[51]  Brian Mirtich,et al.  Fast and Accurate Computation of Polyhedral Mass Properties , 1996, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[52]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The hp‐d‐adaptive finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics , 2012 .

[53]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics , 2008 .

[54]  N. Sukumar,et al.  Generalized Gaussian quadrature rules on arbitrary polygons , 2010 .

[55]  Zhengxiong Yang,et al.  The Finite Cell Method for Geometry-Based Structural Simulation , 2011 .

[56]  Gautam Dasgupta,et al.  Integration within Polygonal Finite Elements , 2003 .

[57]  H. Timmer,et al.  Computation of global geometric properties of solid objects , 1980 .

[58]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Numerical homogenization of heterogeneous and cellular materials utilizing the finite cell method , 2012, Computational Mechanics.

[59]  E. Rank,et al.  Topology optimization using the finite cell method , 2012 .

[60]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Finite cell method , 2007 .

[61]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation—I. Validation , 2002 .

[62]  I. Babuska,et al.  Introduction to Finite Element Analysis: Formulation, Verification and Validation , 2011 .

[63]  Ziad Wassouf Die Mortar Methode für Finite Elemente hoher Ordnung , 2010 .

[64]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  Efficient integration method for fictitious domain approaches , 2015 .

[65]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Meshfree and particle methods and their applications , 2002 .

[66]  Alvise Sommariva,et al.  Product Gauss cubature over polygons based on Green’s integration formula , 2007 .