Results of a Clinical Trial Showing Changes to the Faecal Microbiome in Racing Thoroughbreds after Feeding a Nutritional Supplement

Simple Summary Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract communicate with the immune system and the brain, have a role in energy metabolism and are responsible for gastrointestinal health and gut wall integrity. Veterinary research has reported links between gut bacteria and health. The so-called good bacteria can maintain health while proliferation of pathogenic bacteria can occur in certain conditions, causing colitis, inflammation, colic and dysbiosis. Genetic sequencing of gut bacteria can be used to provide a picture of the composition of the gut microbiome. This information can be used to manage the diet to provide an environment where the good gut bacteria can thrive. This study showed that feeding a prebiotic nutritional supplement resulted in mean and median percent decreases in Bacteroidetes, increases in Firmicutes and the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio that were significantly greater than zero for the treated horses only. Supplemented horses (8/10) were more likely than control horses (2/10) to show an increase in Firmicutes of a ≥9% with ≥24% increase in Clostridia, ≥5% decrease in Bacteroidetes, ≥16% increase in the F:B ratio and ≥2% increase in Actinobacteria (p = 0.01). This provides useful information for further investigations on long-term effects on the microbiome and on health and racing-related outcomes. Abstract Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been used to evaluate the effect of various interventions on the equine microbiome. The aim of this randomised blinded clinical trial was to determine if a prebiotic nutritional supplement would result in a change from baseline in the faecal microbiome composition of racing Thoroughbred horses in training being fed a high concentrate/grain-based diet to be more similar to that found in forage fed/pasture grazed horses. Thirty-two horses on one training yard were randomised to either receive the supplement or not. Faecal samples were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks for NGS of the 16S ribosomal subunit gene. Twenty-two horses completed the trial, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the intention to treat analysis; 20 horses were included in the per protocol analysis. The mean and median percent decreases in Bacteroidetes, increases in Firmicutes and the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio were significantly greater than zero for the treated horses only. Supplemented horses (8/10) were more likely than control horses (2/10) to show an increase in Firmicutes of a ≥9% with ≥24% increase in Clostridia, ≥5% decrease in Bacteroidetes, ≥16% increase in the F:B ratio and ≥2% increase in Actinobacteria (RR = 4, 95% CI: 1.1–14.4, p = 0.01). This provides useful information for further investigations on long-term effects on the microbiome and on health and racing-related outcomes.

[1]  Aldert L. Zomer,et al.  The Equine Faecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Ponies in The Netherlands: Impact of Host and Environmental Factors , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[2]  J. Drouillard,et al.  Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses. , 2020, Journal of animal science.

[3]  C. Cesarini,et al.  Effect of oral administration of omeprazole on the microbiota of the gastric glandular mucosa and feces of healthy horses , 2020, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[4]  J. Murray,et al.  Factors Influencing Equine Gut Microbiota: Current Knowledge. , 2020, Journal of equine veterinary science.

[5]  A. Whitelaw,et al.  The effect of storage conditions on microbial communities in stool , 2020, PloS one.

[6]  E. Memili,et al.  Are prebiotics beneficial for digestion in mature and senior horses? , 2019, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science.

[7]  N. Williams,et al.  Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Glenn R. Gibson,et al.  The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics ( ISAPP ) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics , 2018 .

[9]  Amnon Amir,et al.  Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies , 2016, mSystems.

[10]  J. Choo,et al.  Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  P. Savelkoul,et al.  The Effect of Sampling and Storage on the Fecal Microbiota Composition in Healthy and Diseased Subjects , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  Ó. O’Sullivan,et al.  The Effects of Freezing on Faecal Microbiota as Determined Using MiSeq Sequencing and Culture-Based Investigations , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  R. Hayes,et al.  Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection , 2014, BMC Microbiology.

[14]  M. Claesson,et al.  The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses , 2013, Letters in applied microbiology.

[15]  A. Edwards,et al.  A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of different regions of the equine hindgut. , 2012, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[16]  T. Klaenhammer,et al.  Characterization of the Fecal Microbiota Using High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a Stable Microbial Community during Storage , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  Emma Allen-Vercoe,et al.  Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Horses with Colitis by High Throughput Sequencing of the V3-V5 Region of the 16S rRNA Gene , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  C. Manichanh,et al.  Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis , 2012, BMC Microbiology.

[19]  Roderick V. Jensen,et al.  Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons. , 2012, FEMS microbiology letters.

[20]  H. Flint,et al.  Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease , 2011, British Journal of Nutrition.

[21]  Rob Knight,et al.  Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. , 2010, FEMS microbiology letters.

[22]  G. Casella,et al.  Influence of Fecal Sample Storage on Bacterial Community Diversity , 2009, The open microbiology journal.

[23]  F. Respondek,et al.  Effects of dietary short-chain fructooligosaccharides on the intestinal microflora of horses subjected to a sudden change in diet. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[24]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[25]  Peter Fedor,et al.  A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916-2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the 'Shannon-Wiener' Index , 2003 .

[26]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .