Non-random clustering of stress-related genes during evolution of the S. cerevisiae genome

BackgroundCoordinately regulated genes often physically cluster in eukaryotic genomes, for reasons that remain unclear.ResultsHere we provide evidence that many S. cerevisiae genes induced by starvation and other stresses reside in non-random clusters, where transcription of these genes is repressed in the absence of stress. Most genes essential for growth or for rapid, post-transcriptional responses to stress in cycling cells map between these gene clusters. Genes that are transcriptionally induced by stresses include a large fraction of rapidly evolving paralogues of duplicated genes that arose during an ancient whole genome duplication event. Many of these rapidly evolving paralogues have acquired new or more specialized functions that are less essential for growth. The slowly evolving paralogues of these genes are less likely to be transcriptionally repressed in the absence of stress, and are frequently essential for growth or for rapid stress responses that may require constitutive expression of these genes in cycling cells.ConclusionOur findings suggest that a fundamental organizing principle during evolution of the S. cerevisiae genome has been clustering of starvation and other stress-induced genes in chromosome regions that are transcriptionally repressed in the absence of stress, from which most genes essential for growth or rapid stress responses have been excluded. Chromatin-mediated repression of many stress-induced genes may have evolved since the whole genome duplication in parallel with functions for proteins encoded by these genes that are incompatible with growth. These functions likely provide fitness effects that escape detection in assays of reproductive capacity routinely employed to assess evolutionary fitness, or to identify genes that confer stress-resistance in cycling cells.

[1]  Stanley N Cohen,et al.  Senescence-specific gene expression fingerprints reveal cell-type-dependent physical clustering of up-regulated chromosomal loci , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. Pál,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  Gerald M Rubin,et al.  Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome , 2002, Journal of biology.

[4]  Charles Boone,et al.  A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  Microarray Deacetylation Maps Determine Genome-Wide Functions for Yeast Histone Deacetylases , 2002, Cell.

[6]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome , 1997, Nature.

[8]  S. Elledge,et al.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. , 1998, Genes & development.

[9]  M. Solomon,et al.  Budding Yeast CTDK-I Is Required for DNA Damage-Induced Transcription , 2003, Eukaryotic Cell.

[10]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Gene Order and Dynamic Domains , 2004, Science.

[11]  Dagmar Ringe,et al.  “Sleeping Beauty”: Quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[12]  J. Remacle,et al.  Stress‐Induced Premature Senescence: Essence of Life, Evolution, Stress, and Aging , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Cheng-Fu Chang,et al.  Calculating the statistical significance of physical clusters of co-regulated genes in the genome: the role of chromatin in domain-wide gene regulation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  George M. Church,et al.  Regulatory Networks Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling of Damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells: Rpn4 Links Base Excision Repair with Proteasomes , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast , 1999, Nature.

[17]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[18]  Debra T. Burhans,et al.  Evidence for ORC-dependent repression of budding yeast genes induced by starvation and other stresses. , 2006, FEMS yeast research.

[19]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  Josep Clotet,et al.  Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1 , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  G. Church,et al.  A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[22]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  Nazif Alic,et al.  Cells have distinct mechanisms to maintain protection against different reactive oxygen species: oxidative-stress-response genes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Grant W. Brown,et al.  Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Philip Lijnzaad,et al.  Genome-wide analyses reveal RNA polymerase II located upstream of genes poised for rapid response upon S. cerevisiae stationary phase exit. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[27]  Martin J. Lercher,et al.  Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[28]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[29]  L. Breeden,et al.  Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genes & development.

[30]  T. Miyake,et al.  Genome-wide Analysis of ARS (Autonomously Replicating Sequence) Binding Factor 1 (Abf1p)-mediated Transcriptional Regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  I. Dawes,et al.  Hydrogen Peroxide Causes RAD9-dependent Cell Cycle Arrest in G2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereas Menadione Causes G1 Arrest Independent of RAD9 Function* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  G. C. Johnston,et al.  Ribosomal precursor RNA metabolism and cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[33]  Jeroen Raes,et al.  Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[34]  T. Cooper,et al.  Regulation of Allantoin Catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996 .

[35]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  K. Benjamin,et al.  Sum1 and Ndt80 Proteins Compete for Binding to Middle Sporulation Element Sequences That Control Meiotic Gene Expression , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  L. Breeden,et al.  Xbp1, a stress-induced transcriptional repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi4/Mbp1 family , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[40]  Simon Wong,et al.  Birth of a metabolic gene cluster in yeast by adaptive gene relocation , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[41]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Redundant Roles for Histone H3 N-Terminal Lysine Residues in Subtelomeric Gene Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Genetics.

[42]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Genome-Wide Distribution of ORC and MCM Proteins in S. cerevisiae: High-Resolution Mapping of Replication Origins , 2001, Science.

[43]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[44]  C. Ball,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.