Optoacoustically induced auditory brainstem responses in the mouse model enhanced through an absorbing film

Abstract. Significance: Optoacoustic stimulation offers an alternative stimulation strategy for the hearing organ. To serve as the base for a novel auditory prosthesis, the optoacoustic stimulation must be biocompatible and energy-saving. Aim: Enhancing the efficiency of optoacoustic stimulation while reducing the energy input in a suited animal model. Approach: Optoacoustically induced auditory brainstem responses (oABRs) were recorded after the pulsed laser irradiation of the tympanic membrane (TM) in mice. The results were compared with the ABRs induced through acoustic click stimulation. In addition, self-adhesive absorbing films were applied on the TM before the optoacoustic stimulation to investigate their effect on the resulting ABRs. Results: Using an absorbing film on the TM during optical stimulation led to considerably enhanced oABR wave I amplitude values compared with the stimulation of the bare TM. When using our stimulation strategy, we induced oABR waves in the 50% to 60% range of the acoustical stimulation reached with 80-dB SPL click stimuli. Conclusions: The mouse model can be used for certain developmental work for an optoacoustic auditory prosthesis. Using absorbing films on the TM during optical stimulation considerably enhances oABR wave I amplitude. Optimization of the stimulation strategy could further enhance the efficiency within biocompatibility margins.

[1]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus , 2014, Hearing Research.

[2]  J. Willott.  Measurement of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) to Study Auditory Sensitivity in Mice , 2006, Current protocols in neuroscience.

[3]  Jianren Lu,et al.  Performance analysis of the beam shaping method on optical auditory neural stimulation in vivo , 2015, Lasers in Medical Science.

[4]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Auditory Neural Activity in Congenitally Deaf Mice Induced by Infrared Neural Stimulation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Jürgen Steimle,et al.  Like A Second Skin: Understanding How Epidermal Devices Affect Human Tactile Perception , 2019, CHI.

[6]  H. Mirzadeh,et al.  Collagen-immobilized patch for repairing small tympanic membrane perforations: in vitro and in vivo assays. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  L. Rüttiger,et al.  Biomarkers for Hearing Dysfunction: Facts and Outlook , 2017, ORL.

[8]  W. Frankel,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  V. Flockerzi,et al.  α2δ2 Controls the Function and Trans-Synaptic Coupling of Cav1.3 Channels in Mouse Inner Hair Cells and Is Essential for Normal Hearing , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Willott,et al.  Aging and the auditory brainstem response in mice with severe or minimal presbycusis , 1987, Hearing Research.

[11]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Lack of Bdnf and TrkB signalling in the postnatal cochlea leads to a spatial reshaping of innervation along the tonotopic axis and hearing loss , 2003, Development.

[12]  Kai Bodensiek,et al.  High frequency neural spiking and auditory signaling by ultrafast red-shifted optogenetics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[13]  J. Hell,et al.  L-type CaV1.2 deletion in the cochlea but not in the brainstem reduces noise vulnerability: implication for CaV1.2-mediated control of cochlear BDNF expression , 2013, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[14]  Klas Hjort,et al.  PDMS‐Based Elastomer Tuned Soft, Stretchable, and Sticky for Epidermal Electronics , 2016, Advanced materials.

[15]  Changhyun Pang,et al.  Bioinspired Adhesive Architectures: From Skin Patch to Integrated Bioelectronics , 2019, Advanced materials.

[16]  Sarah C. L. Fischer,et al.  Adhesion and Cellular Compatibility of Silicone-Based Skin Adhesives , 2017 .

[17]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  Bernhard Schick,et al.  Laser-induced tissue remodeling within the tympanic membrane , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  Youn Tae Kim,et al.  Development of flexible self adhesive patch for professional heat stress monitoring service. , 2005, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.

[20]  A. Langenbucher,et al.  Wavelength-specific optoacoustic-induced vibrations of the guinea pig tympanic membrane , 2021, Journal of biomedical optics.

[21]  Sarah C. L. Fischer,et al.  Thin Film Composite Silicon Elastomers for Cell Culture and Skin Applications: Manufacturing and Characterization , 2018, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[22]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts , 2016, Hearing Research.

[23]  L. Rüttiger,et al.  The Reduced Cochlear Output and the Failure to Adapt the Central Auditory Response Causes Tinnitus in Noise Exposed Rats , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Sarah C. L. Fischer,et al.  A Self-Adhesive Elastomeric Wound Scaffold for Sensitive Adhesion to Tissue , 2019, Polymers.

[25]  Sarah C. L. Fischer,et al.  Adhesion and relaxation of a soft elastomer on surfaces with skin like roughness. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[26]  L. Rüttiger,et al.  Two classes of outer hair cells along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea , 2006, Neuroscience.

[27]  Holger Lubatschowski,et al.  Green laser light activates the inner ear. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[28]  S. Lin-Shiau,et al.  Abnormal auditory brainstem responses for mice treated with mercurial compounds: involvement of excessive nitric oxide. , 2001, Toxicology.

[29]  Bernhard Schick,et al.  First biocompatibility margins for optical stimulation at the eardrum via 532-nm laser pulses in a mouse model , 2019, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  M. Kwak,et al.  Rational Design and Enhanced Biocompatibility of a Dry Adhesive Medical Skin Patch , 2011, Advanced materials.

[31]  A. Karabutov,et al.  Time-resolved laser optoacoustic tomography of inhomogeneous media , 1996 .

[32]  T Lenarz,et al.  Optoacoustic induced vibrations within the inner ear. , 2009, Optics express.

[33]  K. Johnson,et al.  Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses , 1999, Hearing Research.

[34]  K. Henry,et al.  Cochlear microphonics and action potentials mature and decline at different rates in the normal and pathologic mouse cochlea. , 1984, Developmental psychobiology.

[35]  Costantino Creton,et al.  Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course , 2003 .

[36]  T. Ripken,et al.  Optoacoustic effect is responsible for laser-induced cochlear responses , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  D L Jewett,et al.  Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Hubert H. Lim,et al.  Frequency-specific activation of the peripheral auditory system using optoacoustic laser stimulation , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Nanosecond laser pulse stimulation of the inner ear—a wavelength study , 2012, Biomedical optics express.