Classifying Medical Projection Techniques based on Parameterization Attribute Preservation

In many areas of medicine, visualization researchers can help by contributing to to task simplification, abstraction or complexity reduction. As these approaches, can allow a better workflow in medical environments by exploiting easier communication through visualization, it is important to question their reliability and their reproducibility. Therefore, within this short paper, we investigate how projections used in medical visualization, can be classified with respect to the handled data and the underlying tasks. Many of these techniques are inspired by mesh parameterization, which allows for reducing a surface from R3 to R2. This makes complex structures often easier to understand by humans and machines. In the following section, we will classify different algorithms in this area (see Table 1) and discuss how these mappings benefit medical visualization.

[1]  Hamid Khosravi,et al.  Multi-surface quasi-isometric flattening of the cortex , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[2]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Flattening maps for the visualization of multibranched vessels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Tim McInerney,et al.  RibbonView: Interactive Context-Preserving Cutaways of Anatomical Surface Meshes , 2010, ISVC.

[4]  T. Chan,et al.  Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping. , 2004, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[5]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Visual Support for Interactive Post‐Interventional Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Map Displays for the Analysis of Scalar Data on Cerebral Aneurysm Surfaces , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Lei Zhu,et al.  An Image Morphing Technique Based on Optimal Mass Preserving Mapping , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Jonathan R. Polimeni,et al.  Near-isometric flattening of brain surfaces , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Conformal Geometry and Brain Flattening , 1999, MICCAI.

[10]  Feng Qiu,et al.  Conformal virtual colon flattening , 2006, SPM '06.

[11]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Nonlinear virtual colon unfolding , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[12]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  T. Banchoff,et al.  Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 2010 .

[14]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Volumetric colon wall unfolding using harmonic differentials , 2011, Comput. Graph..

[15]  Jing Hua,et al.  Area-Preserving Surface Flattening Using Lie Advection , 2011, MICCAI.

[16]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Area Preserving Brain Mapping , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  Planar Visualization of Treelike Structures , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Non-distorting Flattening for Virtual Colonoscopy , 2000, MICCAI.

[19]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  CoViCAD: Comprehensive Visualization of Coronary Artery Disease , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Y. Brenier Polar Factorization and Monotone Rearrangement of Vector-Valued Functions , 1991 .