QSAR and metabolic assessment tools in the assessment of genotoxicity.

In this chapter, a range of computational tools for applying QSAR and grouping/read-across methods are described, and their integrated use in the computational assessment of genotoxicity is illustrated through the application of selected tools to two case-study compounds-2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC) and 2-aminoacetophenone (2-AAP). The first case study compound (AαC) is an environment pollutant and a food contaminant that can be formed during the cooking of protein-rich food. The second case study compound (2-AAP) is a naturally occurring compound in certain foods and also proposed for use as a flavoring agent. The overall aim is to describe and illustrate a possible way of combining different information sources and software tools for genotoxicity and metabolism prediction by means of a simple stepwise approach. The chapter is aimed at researchers and assessors who have a basic knowledge of computational toxicology and some familiarity with the practical use of computational tools. The emphasis is on how to evaluate the data generated by multiple tools, rather than the practical use of any specific tool.

[1]  E. Snyderwine,et al.  DNA adducts of heterocyclic amine food mutagens: implications for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. , 1999, Carcinogenesis.

[2]  G S Probst,et al.  The induction of bacterial mutation and hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis by monosubstituted anilines. , 1983, Environmental mutagenesis.

[3]  Flavourings Public consultation on the draft scientific guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings to be used in or on foods , 2010, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[4]  Wolfgang Pfau,et al.  Syntheses of DNA adducts of two heterocyclic amines, 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAαC) and 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC) and identification of DNA adducts in organs from rats dosed with MeAαC , 2004 .

[5]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: a novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology. , 2008, Mutation research.

[6]  Lapenna Silvia,et al.  A Framework for assessing in silico Toxicity Predictions: Case Studies with selected Pesticides , 2011 .

[7]  Derek J. Knight,et al.  Annex: Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market , 2002 .

[8]  H. Aeschbacher,et al.  Mammalian cell mutagenicity and metabolism of heterocyclic aromatic amines. , 1991, Mutation research.

[9]  G Patlewicz,et al.  Toxmatch–a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[10]  Philip N. Judson,et al.  Using Absolute and Relative Reasoning in the Prediction of the Potential Metabolism of Xenobiotics , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  David E. Gloriam,et al.  The SMARTCyp cytochrome P450 metabolism prediction server , 2010, Bioinform..

[12]  Ronald B. Franklin In Silico Studies in ADME/Tox: Caveat Emptor , 2009 .

[13]  A G Renwick,et al.  Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  J. DiPaolo,et al.  Sister Chromatid Exchange and Chromosome Aberration Analysis With the Use of Several Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens: Brief Communication , 1977 .

[15]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  The Integrated Use of Models for the Properties and Effects of Chemicals by means of a Structured Workflow , 2008 .

[16]  S. Enoch,et al.  Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[17]  E C Miller,et al.  Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules , 1981, Cancer.

[18]  Fuart Gatnik Mojca,et al.  Review of QSAR Models and Software Tools for Predicting of Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity , 2010 .

[19]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. , 2005, Mutation research.

[20]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Computer Prediction of Possible Toxic Action from Chemical Structure; The DEREK System , 1991, Human & experimental toxicology.

[21]  Hanne Frederiksen,et al.  Two food‐borne heterocyclic amines: Metabolism and DNA adduct formation of amino‐α‐carbolines , 2005 .

[22]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Review of QSAR Models and Software Tools for predicting Acute and Chronic Systemic Toxicity , 2010 .

[23]  F. Kadlubar,et al.  In vitro bioactivation of N-hydroxy-2-amino-α-carboline , 2000 .

[24]  A Maunz,et al.  Prediction of chemical toxicity with local support vector regression and activity-specific kernels , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[25]  Christoph Helma,et al.  Lazy structure-activity relationships (lazar) for the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity and Salmonella mutagenicity , 2006, Molecular Diversity.

[26]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Review of QSAR Models and Software Tools for predicting Biokinetic Properties , 2010 .

[27]  T. Shirai,et al.  Identification of the major hepatic DNA adduct formed by the food mutagen 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (A alpha C). , 1997, Chemical research in toxicology.

[28]  A. Tates,et al.  Induction of chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster cells in vitro by some proximate and ultimate carcinogenic arylamide derivatives. , 1981, Mutation research.

[29]  Steven J. Enoch,et al.  Chemical Category Formation and Read-Across for the Prediction of Toxicity , 2010 .

[30]  M. Colvin,et al.  Chemical and biological factors affecting mutagen potency. , 1998, Mutation research.

[31]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  The Role of Qsar Methodology in the Regulatory Assessment of Chemicals , 2010 .

[32]  A W Andrews,et al.  Mutagenic activity of tryptophan metabolites produced by rat intestinal microflora. , 1976, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  M T D Cronin,et al.  A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[34]  J. Kazius,et al.  Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.