Non-invasive electrohysterogram recording using flexible concentric ring electrode

Non-invasive electrohysterogram (EHG) recording could provide valuable information about uterine dynamics. Bipolar EHG has usually been performed using monopolar disposable electrodes. Recently concentric ring electrodes have been used for EHG recordings so as to acquire more localized electrical activity which may be helpful for deducing uterine contraction efficiency. Nevertheless concentric ring electrodes have commonly been implemented in rigid substrates. Therefore they do not adapt to the body surface curvature which may cause discomfort for patients and a poor contact between electrode and skin. The aim of this paper is to examine the feasibility of picking up EHG signals (BC-EHG) using a new flexible tripolar concentric ring (TCR) electrode placed on the abdominal surface, and to compare it with the conventional bipolar recordings. For this purpose, a total of 7 recording sessions were carried out in 7 pregnant women. Each recording implied simultaneous acquisition of one bipolar EHG signal and of two bipolar concentric EHG (BC-EHG) signals using the flexible TCR electrode. Then a set of temporal and spectral parameters was computed from both bipolar EHG and BC-EHG bursts. Experimental results show no noticeable difference in duration and in dominant frequency in Fast Wave High frequency range. Nonetheless, the low frequency content (0.1-0.2 Hz) of BC-EHG records is smaller than that of bipolar record. These results suggest that the new flexible TCR electrode permits to pick up uterine electrical activity and may provide additional information for deducing uterine efficiency.

[1]  Eduardo García-Breijo,et al.  Active flexible concentric ring electrode for non-invasive surface bioelectrical recordings , 2012 .

[2]  Weizhong Dai,et al.  Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for Laplacian electroencephalography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[6]  C. Marque,et al.  Spectral characterization of human EHG frequency components based on the extraction and reconstruction of the ridges in the scalogram , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Holger Maul,et al.  Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[9]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Better Pregnancy Monitoring Using Nonlinear Correlation Analysis of External Uterine Electromyography , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[13]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of the Electrohysterographic Action-Potential Conduction Velocity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Peter P. Tarjan,et al.  Pasteless, Active, Concentric Ring Sensors for Directly Obtained Laplacian Cardiac Electrograms , 2002 .

[15]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.