A Conceptual Framework for Information Retrieval to Support Creativity in Business Processes

Creativity as the prerequisite for innovation is a core competitive factor in contemporary organizations. When creativity happens this involves creative persons who produce creative products in a process that cannot be fully anticipated and predescribed. We introduce the concept of pockets of creativity for those sections of a business process where creativity occurs. These sections are characterized by a high demand for flexibility and knowledge of the involved creative persons. In pockets of creativity previous knowledge is retrieved, transformed and combined into new procedures or artifacts – in short – innovations. Naturally, this raises the question of how pockets of creativity can be supported by information technology. Information retrieval is part of an organizations knowledge processes concerned with the representation, storage, organization, searching and finding of organizational knowledge. Informed by case studies we have conducted with organizations from the Creative Industries and drawing from existing theory, in this paper we introduce a conceptual framework for information retrieval that enables creative persons to access relevant information through a multi-perspective, hierarchical view. Such an approach both appropriately considers different ways of creative thinking and provides stimuli to a person's cognitive network fostering her creativity and thus the development of truly innovative products.

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW プラットフォーム・リーダーシップ:イノベーションのマネジメント , 2002 .

[3]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Multitrees: enriching and reusing hierarchical structure , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  M. D. Mey,et al.  The Cognitive Paradigm: Cognitive Science, a Newly Explored Approach to the Study of Cognition Applied in an Analysis of Science and Scientific Knowledge , 1982 .

[5]  G. A. Miller The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[6]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[7]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Modelling and Supporting Processes in Creative Environments , 2007, ECIS.

[8]  Christian S. Brelage Web information system development: conceptual modelling of navigation for satisfying information needs , 2006 .

[9]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[10]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[11]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[12]  J. Becker,et al.  The Process in Focus , 2003 .

[13]  Willie Breeze,et al.  The Relationship of Theory and Research , 1993, AORN Journal.

[14]  B. Holzner,et al.  Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society , 1979 .

[15]  AlaviMaryam,et al.  Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems , 2001 .

[16]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[17]  R. Weisberg Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[18]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[19]  J. Spender Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[20]  Brennig James,et al.  The Nature of Creativity , 1992 .

[21]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems , 1995 .

[22]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  The cognitive network model of creativity: a new causal model of creativity and a new brainstorming technique , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[24]  M. D. Mey The Cognitive Paradigm , 1992 .

[25]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[26]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  Brenda Massetti,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation , 1996, MIS Q..

[28]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[29]  Wang Xiao,et al.  About the Creative Education , 2004 .

[30]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[31]  R. Sternberg RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity , 2006 .

[32]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[33]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Supporting creativity with powerful composition tools for artifacts and performances , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Ralf D. Brown Creativity: What are we to measure? , 1989 .

[35]  A. Osborn Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[36]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[37]  Anne Murphy,et al.  Creativity at Work , 2008 .

[38]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[41]  I. Nonaka The knowledge creating company". Harvard Business Review : . , 1991 .

[42]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[43]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.