Predictive Coding or Evidence Accumulation? False Inference and Neuronal Fluctuations

Perceptual decisions can be made when sensory input affords an inference about what generated that input. Here, we report findings from two independent perceptual experiments conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a sparse event-related design. The first experiment, in the visual modality, involved forced-choice discrimination of coherence in random dot kinematograms that contained either subliminal or periliminal motion coherence. The second experiment, in the auditory domain, involved free response detection of (non-semantic) near-threshold acoustic stimuli. We analysed fluctuations in ongoing neural activity, as indexed by fMRI, and found that neuronal activity in sensory areas (extrastriate visual and early auditory cortex) biases perceptual decisions towards correct inference and not towards a specific percept. Hits (detection of near-threshold stimuli) were preceded by significantly higher activity than both misses of identical stimuli or false alarms, in which percepts arise in the absence of appropriate sensory input. In accord with predictive coding models and the free-energy principle, this observation suggests that cortical activity in sensory brain areas reflects the precision of prediction errors and not just the sensory evidence or prediction errors per se.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[2]  A. Borst Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Determinants and mechanisms of attentional modulation of neural processing. , 2001, Frontiers in Bioscience.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Neural Structures Expressing Perceptual Hysteresis in Visual Letter Recognition , 2002, Neuron.

[5]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[12]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  M. Boly,et al.  Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[16]  Karl J. Friston Hierarchical Models in the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  Endogenous brain oscillations and related networks detected by surface EEG‐combined fMRI , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  R. Romo,et al.  The role of fluctuations in perception , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Ongoing Activity Fluctuations in hMT+ Bias the Perception of Coherent Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Distributed and Antagonistic Contributions of Ongoing Activity Fluctuations to Auditory Stimulus Detection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  O. Sporns,et al.  Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Seamans,et al.  Dopamine Modulates Persistent Synaptic Activity and Enhances the Signal-to-Noise Ratio in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, PloS one.