Transfer Learning Improves Supervised Image Segmentation Across Imaging Protocols

The variation between images obtained with different scanners or different imaging protocols presents a major challenge in automatic segmentation of biomedical images. This variation especially hampers the application of otherwise successful supervised-learning techniques which, in order to perform well, often require a large amount of labeled training data that is exactly representative of the target data. We therefore propose to use transfer learning for image segmentation. Transfer-learning techniques can cope with differences in distributions between training and target data, and therefore may improve performance over supervised learning for segmentation across scanners and scan protocols. We present four transfer classifiers that can train a classification scheme with only a small amount of representative training data, in addition to a larger amount of other training data with slightly different characteristics. The performance of the four transfer classifiers was compared to that of standard supervised classification on two magnetic resonance imaging brain-segmentation tasks with multi-site data: white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid segmentation; and white-matter-/MS-lesion segmentation. The experiments showed that when there is only a small amount of representative training data available, transfer learning can greatly outperform common supervised-learning approaches, minimizing classification errors by up to 60%.

[1]  Marleen de Bruijne,et al.  Supervised Image Segmentation across Scanner Protocols: A Transfer Learning Approach , 2012, MLMI.

[2]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  The Rotterdam Scan Study: design and update up to 2012 , 2011, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[3]  Olivier Clatz,et al.  Spatial decision forests for MS lesion segmentation in multi-channel magnetic resonance images , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Comaniciu,et al.  A discriminative model-constrained EM approach to 3D MRI brain tissue classification and intensity non-uniformity correction , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Evaluating intensity normalization on MRIs of human brain with multiple sclerosis , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[8]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility study of automatic MRI brain tissue segmentation methods , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Discriminative, Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tissue in MR Images , 2009, MICCAI.

[10]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  An Adaptive Mean-Shift Framework for MRI Brain Segmentation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  B. Ginneken,et al.  3D Segmentation in the Clinic: A Grand Challenge , 2007 .

[12]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Instance Weighting for Domain Adaptation in NLP , 2007, ACL.

[13]  Rong Yan,et al.  Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive svms , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[14]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-Nearest-Neighbor classification , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Boosting for transfer learning , 2007, ICML '07.

[16]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Constrained Gaussian mixture model framework for automatic segmentation of MR brain images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Jing-Huei Lee,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images Using Spatial-Varying Gaussian Mixture and Markov Random Field Approach , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[18]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Automated in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI with Morphology‐Enhanced probability maps , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Mohammed Yakoob Siyal,et al.  An intelligent modified fuzzy c-means based algorithm for bias estimation and segmentation of brain MRI , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Koen L. Vincken,et al.  Probabilistic segmentation of brain tissue in MR imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. Hofman,et al.  Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[23]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Fast and robust parameter estimation for statistical partial volume models in brain MRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  Koen L. Vincken,et al.  Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Improving SVM accuracy by training on auxiliary data sources , 2004, ICML.

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Learning With Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2001 .

[28]  A. Hofman,et al.  Silent Brain Infarcts and White Matter Lesions Increase Stroke Risk in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study , 2003, Stroke.

[29]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[30]  A. Hofman,et al.  Periventricular cerebral white matter lesions predict rate of cognitive decline , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[31]  J.L. Marroquin,et al.  An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  R. Leahy,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Image Tissue Classification Using a Partial Volume Model , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Frithjof Kruggel,et al.  Segmentation of MR images with intensity inhomogeneities , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[35]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[37]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[38]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[39]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[40]  Ole Fogh Olsen,et al.  Segmenting Articular Cartilage Automatically Using a Voxel Classification Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  Jing Bai,et al.  Atlas-Based Fuzzy Connectedness Segmentation and Intensity Nonuniformity Correction Applied to Brain MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[43]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  James Parker,et al.  on Knowledge and Data Engineering, , 1990 .