Update on Radiation Safety in the Cath Lab – Moving Toward a “Lead-Free” Environment

[1]  K. Chida,et al.  Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff , 2023, Sensors.

[2]  S. Pancholy,et al.  Comparison of radiation exposure associated with transradial and transfemoral access: An updated meta‐analysis , 2022, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  A. Roguin,et al.  Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern? , 2022, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Talboys,et al.  Assessment of occupational dose reduction with the use of a floor mounted mobile lead radiation protection shield , 2022, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  R. Madder,et al.  Comparison of Radiation Exposure Among Interventional Echocardiographers, Interventional Cardiologists, and Sonographers During Percutaneous Structural Heart Interventions , 2022, JAMA network open.

[6]  S. Dixon,et al.  D-20 | Novel Catheterization Laboratory Radiation Protection System Eliminates Need for Personal Lead Aprons , 2022, Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  K. Bhat,et al.  Minimizing scattered radiation dose in cardiac catheterization laboratory during interventional procedures using lead free drape – MILD study , 2022, Indian heart journal.

[8]  A. Anadiotis,et al.  Factors affecting radiation exposure during transradial cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2022, Clinical radiology.

[9]  M. Jastrzębski,et al.  Occupational exposure to physicians working with a Zero-Gravity™ protection system in haemodynamic and electrophysiology labs and the assessment of its performance against a standard ceiling suspended shield , 2022, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.

[10]  E. Lev,et al.  A novel robotic radiation shielding device for interventional cardiology procedures. , 2022, EuroIntervention.

[11]  L. Gheorghe,et al.  Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations , 2022, World journal of cardiology.

[12]  S. Dixon,et al.  A novel catheterization laboratory radiation shielding system: Results of pre-clinical testing. , 2021, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[13]  L. Gheorghe,et al.  The radioprotective effect of the Cathpax® AIR cabin during interventional cardiology procedures , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  Mahmood Ahmad,et al.  Robotic-assisted PCI: The future of coronary intervention? , 2021, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[15]  D. Albuquerque,et al.  TIger II vs JUdkins Catheters for Transradial Coronary Angiography (TIJUCA Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiation Exposure. , 2021, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[16]  R. Madder,et al.  Patient body mass index and occupational radiation doses to circulating nurses during coronary angiography. , 2020, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[17]  A. Roguin,et al.  Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterisation lab: best practice , 2020, Heart.

[18]  L. Klein,et al.  SCAI Multi-Society Position Statement on Occupational Health Hazards of the Catheterization Laboratory: Shifting the Paradigm for Healthcare Workers' Protection. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Cigarroa,et al.  Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  Katsuya Fujita,et al.  Angular dependence of shielding effect of radiation protective eyewear for radiation protection of crystalline lens , 2019, Radiological Physics and Technology.

[21]  Ha Lu,et al.  Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite? , 2019, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[22]  M. Beijk,et al.  Cardiology fellows-in-training are exposed to relatively high levels of radiation in the cath lab compared with staff interventional cardiologists—insights from the RECAP trial , 2019, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[23]  Jae Hun Kim,et al.  Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management , 2018, The Korean journal of pain.

[24]  J. Spratt,et al.  A retrospective study of radiation dose measurements comparing different cath lab X‐ray systems in a sample population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Robert H. Wilson,et al.  TCT-248 A New Device to Markedly Reduce Cardiac Cath Lab Radiation Levels , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  G. Raff,et al.  2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  S. M. Hosseini Pooya,et al.  Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging. , 2018, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[28]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Radiation‐associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Results from the IC‐CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to RAdiation in the CaTh lab) study , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[29]  S. Ernst,et al.  Occupational radiation exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory with a focus on personnel with reproductive potential and during pregnancy: A European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[30]  N. Nader,et al.  Radiation exposure levels according to vascular access sites during PCI , 2017, Herz.

[31]  M. Beijk,et al.  Efficacy of the RADPAD Protection Drape in Reducing Operators’ Radiation Exposure in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[32]  J. Hirshfeld,et al.  Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterization: Operator Behavior Matters. , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[33]  Mitul Patel,et al.  Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[34]  J. Abunassar,et al.  Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization lab: A time series quality improvement initiative. , 2017, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[35]  P. Jüni,et al.  Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  G. Rouault,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study. , 2017, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[37]  Meiping Huang,et al.  Operator Radiation and the Efficacy of Ceiling-Suspended Lead Screen Shielding during Coronary Angiography: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study Using Real-Time Dosimeters , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[38]  M. Schlumberger,et al.  Radiation exposure and thyroid cancer: a review , 2017, Archives of endocrinology and metabolism.

[39]  Hannes Deutschmann,et al.  Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Results of the RAPID Trial. , 2016, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

[40]  A. Roguin,et al.  A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans‐radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[41]  R. Mongrain,et al.  Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[42]  K. Lee,et al.  Types and Arrangement of Thyroid Shields to Reduce Exposure of Surgeons to Ionizing Radiation During Intraoperative Use of C-arm Fluoroscopy , 2013, Spine.

[43]  J. Piek,et al.  Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With Higher Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiography , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[44]  M. Eagleton,et al.  Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[45]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[46]  Ariel Roguin,et al.  Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[47]  Juan F Granada,et al.  Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  Dixon Magnuson,et al.  Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[49]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[50]  R. Mehran,et al.  SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel. , 2011, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[51]  Madan M Rehani,et al.  Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern? , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[52]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[53]  K. Empen,et al.  Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[54]  M. Finkelstein.  Is brain cancer an occupational disease of cardiologists? , 1998, The Canadian journal of cardiology.