Simulating point spread functions for the James Webb Space Telescope with WebbPSF

Experience with the Hubble Space Telescope has shown that accurate models of optical performance are extremely desirable to astronomers, both for assessing feasibility and planning scientific observations, and for data analyses such as point-spread-function (PSF)-fitting photometry and astrometry, deconvolution, and PSF subtraction. Compared to previous space observatories, the temporal variability and active control of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) pose a significantly greater challenge for accurate modeling. We describe here some initial steps toward meeting the community's need for such PSF simulations. A software package called WebbPSF now provides the capability for simulating PSFs for JWST's instruments in all imaging modes, including direct imaging, coronagraphy, and non-redundant aperture masking. WebbPSF is intended to provide model PSFs suitable for planning observations and creating mock science data, via a straightforward interface accessible to any astronomer; as such it is complementary to the sophisticated but complex-to-use modeling tools used primarily by optical designers. WebbPSF is implemented using a new exible and extensible optical propagation library in the Python programming language. While the initial version uses static precomputed wavefront simulations, over time this system is evolving to include both spatial and temporal variation in PSFs, building on existing modeling efforts within the JWST program. Our long-term goal is to provide a general-purpose PSF modeling capability akin to Hubble's Tiny Tim software, and of sufficient accuracy to be useful to the community.

[1]  Jay Anderson,et al.  PSFs, Photometry, and Astronomy for the ACS/WFC , 2006 .

[2]  Colin R. Cox,et al.  Point-spread function modeling for the James Webb Space Telescope , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  J. Scott Knight,et al.  Image quality verification analysis of the JWST , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  J. Krist Simulation of HST PSFs using Tiny Tim , 1995 .

[5]  John E. Krist,et al.  Tiny Tim : an HST PSF Simulator , 1993 .

[6]  Felix Stoehr,et al.  WFC3 Support in Tiny Tim , 2008 .

[7]  John E. Krist,et al.  20 years of Hubble Space Telescope optical modeling using Tiny Tim , 2011 .

[8]  John E. Krist,et al.  The temporal optical behavior of the Hubble Space Telescope: the impact on science observations , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  Colin R. Cox,et al.  Evaluation of a temperature- based HST Focus Model , 2011 .

[10]  N. Rowlands,et al.  The JWST tunable filter imager (TFI) , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  J. Scott Knight,et al.  Verification of the observatory integrated model for the JWST , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  J. Scott Knight,et al.  Verification of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) wavefront sensing and control system , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[13]  R. Vanderbei,et al.  Fast computation of Lyot-style coronagraph propagation. , 2007, Optics express.

[14]  Marcia J. Rieke,et al.  Limits on routine wavefront sensing with NIRCam on JWST , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Marcia J. Rieke,et al.  Hunting planets and observing disks with the JWST NIRCam coronagraph , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.