Functional and phylogenetic similarity among communities

Summary Ecological studies often rely on coefficients of intercommunity (dis)similarity to decipher effects of ecological, evolutionary and human-driven mechanisms on the composition of communities. Yet, two main criticisms have been levelled at (dis)similarity coefficients. First, few developments include information on species' abundances, and either phylogeny or functional traits. Secondly, some (dis)similarity coefficients fail to always provide maximum dissimilarity between two completely distinct communities, that is, communities without common species and with zero similarities among their species. Here, we introduce a new family of similarity coefficients responding to these criticisms. Within this family, we concentrate on four coefficients and compare them to Rao's dissimilarity on macroinvertebrate communities, and simulated data. Our new coefficients correctly treat maximally dissimilar communities: similarities are always zero between two completely distinct communities. The originality of these new coefficients is even more profound as the existence of maximally dissimilar communities was not a requirement for the new coefficients to behave differently than Rao's dissimilarity coefficient. Our new family of similarity coefficients relies on the abundances or occurrences of species within communities and on phylogenetic, taxonomic or functional similarities among species. We demonstrate that this new family embeds many of the recent developments in both functional and phylogenetic diversity. It provides a unique framework for comparing traditional compositional turnover with functional or phylogenetic similarities among communities.

[1]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  The ade4 package - I : One-table methods , 2004 .

[2]  János Podani,et al.  Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data , 2000 .

[3]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  The apportionment of quadratic entropy: a useful alternative for partitioning diversity in ecological data , 2005, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[4]  J. Elith,et al.  Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , 2007 .

[5]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[6]  Matthew R. Helmus,et al.  Phylogenetic Metrics of Community Similarity , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[7]  D. Chessel,et al.  Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[8]  C. McAlpine,et al.  Influence of Interspecific Competition and Landscape Structure on Spatial Homogenization of Avian Assemblages , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Richard S. Varga,et al.  A Linear Algebra Proof that the Inverse of a Strictly UltrametricMatrix is a Strictly Diagonally Dominant Stieltjes Matrix , 1994 .

[10]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[11]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[12]  L. Jost Entropy and diversity , 2006 .

[13]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[14]  A. Chao,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity, similarity, and differentiation measures based on Hill numbers , 2014 .

[15]  R. Sokal,et al.  Principles of numerical taxonomy , 1965 .

[16]  László Papp,et al.  Application of the quadratic entropy indices for diversity studies of drosophilid assemblages , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[17]  P. Jaccard,et al.  Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura , 1901 .

[18]  D. Faith,et al.  Resemblance in phylogenetic diversity among ecological assemblages , 2010 .

[19]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data , 1994 .

[20]  M. Nei,et al.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  P. Meirmans USING THE AMOVA FRAMEWORK TO ESTIMATE A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  C. Graham,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[23]  R. Knight,et al.  UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Correlations between phylogenetic and functional diversity: mathematical artefacts or true ecological and evolutionary processes? , 2013 .

[25]  森下 Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. , 1961 .

[26]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[27]  D. Chessel,et al.  From dissimilarities among species to dissimilarities among communities: a double principal coordinate analysis. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  David Mouillot,et al.  The multidimensionality of the niche reveals functional diversity changes in benthic marine biotas across geological time. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[29]  H. S. Horn,et al.  Measurement of "Overlap" in Comparative Ecological Studies , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[30]  B. Guinand,et al.  Longitudinal changes in Trichoptera and Coleoptera assemblages and environmental conditions in the Loire River (France) , 1997 .

[31]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[32]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[33]  László Orlóci,et al.  An Agglomerative Method for Classification of Plant Communities , 1967 .

[34]  A. Ochiai Zoogeographical Studies on the Soleoid Fishes Found in Japan and its Neighbouring Regions-III , 1957 .

[35]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Through the Jungle of Biological Diversity , 2005, Acta biotheoretica.

[36]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Hierarchical partitioning of evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogenetically-structured species assemblages: application to rockfish (genus: Sebastes) in the Southern California Bight. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[37]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[38]  H. Gleason,et al.  Some Applications of the Quadrat Method , 1920 .

[39]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[40]  Cyril Burt,et al.  THE FACTORIAL STUDY OF TEMPERAMENTAL TRAITS , 1948 .

[41]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Microbes on mountainsides: Contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Diversity partitioning of Rao's quadratic entropy. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[43]  David Wishart,et al.  256 NOTE: An Algorithm for Hierarchical Classifications , 1969 .