Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.

The soft tissue profile has been studied extensively in orthodontics, primarily from lateral cephalometric radiographs, under the assumption that the form of the soft tissue outline largely determines the esthetics of the whole face. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative contribution of the shape of the soft tissue profile outline on the attractiveness of the face, as seen from the profile view. Pretreatment color profile facial photographs of 20 female patients were used. The photographs were scanned, and the soft tissue outlines were digitized. The average outline of the 20 original photographs was then calculated and used as a template for modifying the photographs with computer warping methods. This resulted in 20 warped photographs, all with the same soft tissue outline. Three additional photographs were constructed with 1 face-the composite average of the 20 original photographs-and 3 hairstyles from 3 of the original pictures. The photographs were printed and presented to 10 laypersons and 10 orthodontists for scoring. Scoring was performed on 2 occasions separated by at least 1 week. On the first occasion, the original photographs of 10 of the patients and the warped photographs of the other 10 patients were shown. At the next session, the remaining 10 original and 10 warped photographs were shown. The 3 composite photographs were interspersed with the 20 pictures shown to the judges in each scoring session. Judges were asked to score facial attractiveness on a scale of 0 to 10. The judges were unaware of both the computer modification of the photographs and the purpose of the study. Good agreement was noted between the judges, although the orthodontists tended to be more influenced by the profile outline than did the laypersons. The 3 averaged composite photographs were consistently given the highest scores. The modified photographs were given higher scores than their original counterparts, showing that facial attractiveness is influenced by soft tissue outline form. However, the score improvement was not sufficient to reach the level of the composite images, especially for faces initially judged as being unattractive. This shows that factors other than profile outline shape may be more influential in facial esthetics.

[1]  L. Dermaut,et al.  Soft-tissue profile preference. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[2]  P. Lines,et al.  Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.

[3]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[4]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[5]  H Peck,et al.  A concept of facial esthetics. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[6]  D J Halazonetis,et al.  Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  C A Evans,et al.  Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S. Cochrane,et al.  Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[9]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[10]  W. J. S. Kerr,et al.  Panel Perception of Facial Attractiveness , 1990, British journal of orthodontics.

[11]  W. Proffit,et al.  A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  T. Southard,et al.  Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  R. Nanda,et al.  Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  A. W. Moore,et al.  Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. , 1979, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[16]  É. Foster Profile preferences among diversified groups. , 1973, The Angle orthodontist.

[18]  S. J. Bowman More than lip service: facial esthetics in orthodontics. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.