On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012

Companies increasingly adopt process management technology which offers promising perspectives for realizing flexible information systems. However, there still exist numerous process scenarios not adequately covered by contemporary information systems. One major reason for this deficiency is the insufficient understanding of the inherent relationships existing between business processes on the one side and business data on the other. Consequently, these two perspectives are not well integrated in many existing process management systems. This paper emphasizes the need for both objectand process-awareness in future information systems, and illustrates it along several examples. Especially, the relation between these two fundamental perspectives will be discussed, and the role of business objects and data as drivers for both process modeling and process enactment be emphasized. In general, any business process support should consider object behavior as well as object interactions, and therefore be based on two levels of granularity. In addition, data-driven process execution and integrated user access to processes and data are needed. Besides giving insights into these fundamental characteristics, an advanced framework supporting them in an integrated manner will be presented and its application to real-world process scenarios be shown. Overall, a holistic and generic framework integrating processes, data, and users will contribute to overcome many of the limitations of existing process management technology.

[1]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Reasoning with Key Performance Indicators , 2011, PoEM.

[2]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Business Intelligence Modeling in Action: A Hospital Case Study , 2012, CAiSE.

[3]  Insup Lee,et al.  Strong and Weak Policy Relations , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.

[4]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Simple and Minimum-Cost Satisfiability for Goal Models , 2004, CAiSE.

[5]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Experiences in Mapping the Business Intelligence Model to Description Logics, and the Case for Parametric Concepts , 2012, Description Logics.

[6]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Overview of OntoClean , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[7]  Siani Pearson,et al.  Enhancing Accountability in the Cloud via Sticky Policies , 2011, STA Workshops.

[8]  Daniel Amyot,et al.  Evaluating goal models within the goal‐oriented requirement language , 2010, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  Christopher Millard,et al.  Contracts for clouds: comparison and analysis of the Terms and Conditions of cloud computing services , 2011, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[10]  Andreas L. Opdahl Anatomy of the Unified Enterprise Modelling Ontology , 2011, IWEI.

[11]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  WonderWeb Deliverable D17. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology , 2002 .

[12]  Vanessa L. Ong An Architecture and Prototype System for Automatically Processing Natural-Language Statements of Policy , 2001 .

[13]  Jianfeng Du,et al.  Towards Practical ABox Abduction in Large OWL DL Ontologies , 2011, AAAI.

[14]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Text Processing with GATE , 2011 .

[15]  Alexander Borgida,et al.  Description Logics in Data Management , 1995, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[16]  Sadie Creese,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Privacy Policies with Consent and Revocation Requirements , 2010, PrimeLife.

[17]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Towards Regulatory Compliance: Extracting Rights and Obligations to Align Requirements with Regulations , 2006, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06).

[18]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Reasoning on UML class diagrams , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Giuseppe Berio,et al.  An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling , 2012, Appl. Ontology.

[20]  Sadie Creese,et al.  Refinement checking for privacy policies , 2012, Sci. Comput. Program..

[21]  Sebastian Rudolph,et al.  Description Logic Rules , 2010, ECAI.

[22]  Hans Kraml,et al.  States of affairs , 1998 .

[23]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models , 2003, J. Data Semant..