Monotonicity of minimum distance inefficiency measures for Data Envelopment Analysis

This research explores the minimum distance inefficiency measure for the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. A critical issue is that this measure does not satisfy monotonicity, i.e., the measure may provide a better evaluation score to an inferior decision making unit (DMU) than to a superior one. To overcome this, a variant called the extended facet approach has been introduced. This approach, however, requires a certain regularity condition to be met. We discuss several special classes of the DEA model, and show that for these models, the minimum distance inefficiency measure satisfies the monotonicity property without the regularity condition. Moreover, we conducted computational experiments using real-world data sets from these special classes, and demonstrated that the extended facet approach may overestimate the performance of a DMU.

[1]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Efficiency measurement with a non-convex free disposal hull technology , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[3]  J. Pastor,et al.  On how to properly calculate the Euclidean distance-based measure in DEA , 2014 .

[4]  Loo Hay Lee,et al.  DEA based on strongly efficient and inefficient frontiers and its application on port efficiency measurement , 2012, OR Spectr..

[5]  Walter Briec,et al.  Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[6]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding strong defining hyperplanes of Production Possibility Set , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  Characterizing and finding full dimensional efficient facets in DEA: a variable returns to scale specification , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The determination of the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis oriented models: Modelling and computational aspects ☆ , 2016 .

[9]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies , 2003 .

[10]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Distance optimization approach to ratio-form efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1986 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .

[15]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA , 2014 .

[16]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Input-output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Atsuhiko Kai,et al.  LEAST DISTANCE BASED INEFFICIENCY MEASURES ON THE PARETO-EFFICIENT FRONTIER IN DEA , 2012 .

[19]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: an extended facet approach , 1996 .

[20]  Walter Briec,et al.  Minimum Distance to the Complement of a Convex Set: Duality Result , 1997 .

[21]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  How to Deal with Non-Convex Frontiers in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[22]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Benchmarking and Data Envelopment Analysis. An Approach based on Metaheuristics , 2014, ICCS.

[23]  SBM variations revisited , 2015 .

[24]  A. Bessent,et al.  Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis , 1988, Oper. Res..

[25]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Optimal input/output reduction in production processes , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Identification and Use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA , 2003 .

[27]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Decomposing the efficient frontier of the DEA production possibility set into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons by mixed integer programming , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  R Shahverdi,et al.  Improvement Least-Distance Measure Model with Coplanar DMU on Strong Hyperplanes , 2011 .

[29]  Boon L. Lee,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of International, Domestic, and Budget Airlines: Nonparametric Evidence , 2010 .

[30]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[31]  Haoxun Chen,et al.  Closest targets in environmental efficiency evaluation based on enhanced Russell measure , 2015 .

[32]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Graph productivity change measure using the least distance to the pareto-efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis , 2017 .

[33]  Chulwoo Baek,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[34]  Paolo Marcellini,et al.  Local Boundedness of Minimizers with Limit Growth Conditions , 2015, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[35]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  Using the Minimum Distance of DMUs from the Frontier of the PPS for Evaluating Group Performance of DMUs in DEA , 2012, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  Efficiency and Global Scale Characteristics on the “No Free Lunch” Assumption Only , 2004 .

[37]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Water Supply Services in Japan with RAM: a Range-adjusted Measure of Inefficiency , 1998 .

[38]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[39]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Measures of technical efficiency , 1985 .

[40]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis of OR/MS journals , 2005, Scientometrics.