Principles of the Exclusive Muddle

This paper provides a lexical entry schema for exclusives covering the adverbs only, just, exclusively, merely, purely, solely, simply, and the adjectives only, sole, pure, exclusive and alone. We argue, on the basis of inter-paraphrasability relations among these exclusives and entailments involving at least and at most, that all of these items make an at-issue contribution of an upper bound on the viable answers to the current question under discussion (expressible with at most), and signal that a lower bound on those answers (expressible with at least) is taken for granted. The lexical entry schema accommodates two main points of variation, which makes it possible to capture the differences in meaning among these terms: (i) semantic type (restricted to the class of modifiers), and (ii) constraints on the current question under discussion or the strength ranking over its alternative possible answers. We propose 22 different specific instantiations of the schema for exclusives in English.

[1]  Robert van Rooy Relevance Only , 2002 .

[2]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[3]  Anamaria Fӑlӑuş Alternatives in Semantics , 2013 .

[4]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Weak NP ’ s in HAVE Sentences 1 , 1999 .

[5]  D. Beaver,et al.  Weak Uniqueness: The Only Difference Between Definites and Indefinites , 2012 .

[6]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  Negation and polarity : syntactic and semantic perspectives , 2000 .

[7]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[8]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[9]  Michael Wagner NPI-Licensing and Focus Movement , 2005 .

[10]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  ter Meulen,et al.  Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 5 , 2004 .

[12]  Craige Roberts Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[13]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[14]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Studies in discourse, representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers , 1987 .

[15]  Jay David Atlas Topic/Comment, Presupposition, Logical Form and Focus Stress Implicatures: The Case of Focal Particles only and also , 1991, J. Semant..

[16]  Daniel Hole,et al.  Focus and Background Marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and Theory behind cai, jiu, dou and ye , 2003 .

[17]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Presuppositions, Conventional Implicature, and Beyond: A unified account of projection , 2009 .

[18]  Laurence R. Horn 'Only' XL: The Assertoric Asymmetry of Exponibles , 2009 .

[19]  Michela Ippolito,et al.  On the Meaning of Only , 2007, J. Semant..

[20]  Elizabeth Coppock,et al.  Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers , 2013 .

[21]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Genitives, relational nouns, and argument-modifier ambiguity , 2002 .

[22]  吴道平 Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic But Were Ashamed to Ask , 1985 .

[23]  Chris Kennedy From Grammar to Meaning: A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words , 2013 .

[24]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type‐shifting Principles , 2008 .

[25]  Katharina Hartmann,et al.  The Syntax And Semantics Of Focus-Sensitive ParticlesIn German , 2001 .

[26]  Daniel Büring,et al.  The Least at least Can Do , 2008 .

[27]  D. Beaver,et al.  Exclusivity , uniqueness , and definiteness , 2012 .

[28]  J. Ginzburg Interrogatives: questions, facts and dialogue , 1996 .

[29]  Friederike Moltmann The Semantics of Together , 2004 .

[30]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[31]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  A solution to the projection problem , 1979 .

[32]  Jay David Atlas The Importance of Being 'Only': Testing the Neo-Gricean Versus Neo-Entailment Paradigms , 1993, J. Semant..

[33]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  Bare Plurals, Bare Conditionals, and Only , 1997, J. Semant..

[34]  Ken Turner,et al.  The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view , 1999 .

[35]  Elizabeth Coppock,et al.  Exclusive Updates , 2011, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[36]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Interpreting focus , 2004 .

[37]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning , 2008 .

[38]  Godehard Link The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[39]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Only, Emotive Factive Verbs, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency , 2006 .

[40]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[41]  P. Grosz On the Grammar of Optative Constructions , 2012 .

[42]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment, and Context Dependency , 1999, J. Semant..

[43]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics , 1999 .

[44]  Jay David Atlas,et al.  'Only' Noun Phrases, Pseudo-Negative Generalized Quantifiers, Negative Polarity Items, and Monotonicity+ , 1996, J. Semant..

[45]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Only: Meaning and implicatures , 2005 .

[46]  Elena Guerzoni,et al.  Why even ask? : on the pragmatics of questions and the semantics of answers , 2003 .

[47]  LAURI KARTTUNEN,et al.  PRESUPPOSITION AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT , 1974 .

[48]  Charles B. Chang,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2008 .

[49]  P. Dekker,et al.  Questions in dynamic semantics , 2007 .

[50]  Christopher Potts The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[51]  Laurence R. Horn Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference , 1996, J. Semant..

[52]  C. L. Hamblin Mathematical models of dialogue1 , 2008 .

[53]  M. Biezma Optatives: Deriving Desirability from Scalar Alternatives , 2011 .

[54]  A. Bonomi,et al.  Only: Association with focus in event semantics , 1993 .

[55]  H. Savin,et al.  The projection problem for presuppositions , 1971 .

[56]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[57]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Five only pieces , 2004 .

[58]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[59]  P. Schlenker Maximize Presupposition and Gricean reasoning , 2012 .

[60]  M. Krifka At least some Determiners aren ’ t Determiners , 1999 .

[61]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[62]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Focusing and background operators , 1991 .

[63]  U. Sauerland,et al.  Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics , 2007 .

[64]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Focus and Presupposition in Dynamic Interpretation , 1993, J. Semant..

[65]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Artikel und Definitheit Articles and Definiteness , 1991 .

[66]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[67]  Only Scalar , 2006 .

[68]  R. Schwarzschild Why Some Foci Must Associate 1 , 1997 .

[69]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[70]  E. Herburger What Counts: Focus and Quantification , 2000 .

[71]  M. de Rijke,et al.  JFAK. Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th Birthday , 1999 .

[72]  G. Chierchia,et al.  The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics , 2008 .

[73]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  Fokus und Skalen , 1983 .

[74]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Interpreting focus again , 2004 .