Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOEs) were recorded in a group of normally hearing subjects (29 ears) and a group of subjects whose conditions were diagnosed as sensorineural hearing loss (23 ears) to study any correlation that might exist between DPOE characteristics and hearing impairment of different configurations. Three different DPOE paradigms have been used to investigate the influence of different test parameters on the DPOE data for normal and hearing-impaired ears. All normally hearing ears demonstrated detectable DPOEs, provided that the primary tone level was above a certain value. Hearing-impaired ears produced substantially reduced DPOEs compared with normally hearing subjects when the primary frequencies f1 and f2 corresponded to the region of hearing loss. Our data also suggested that, in general, more than one f2/f1 ratio is needed to examine any particular frequency region. The DPOEs provide frequency-specific information about cochlear function, which after further development, may form a basis for a noninvasive, objective method of evaluating cochlear function.

[1]  F Disant,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1989, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[2]  D. Mountain,et al.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. , 1980, Science.

[3]  J. Katz,et al.  Handbook of clinical audiology , 1978 .

[4]  D T Kemp,et al.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[5]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Evaluation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a basis for the objective clinical assessment of cochlear function , 1990 .

[6]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  D. O. Kim Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations , 1980, Hearing Research.

[8]  W. W. Clark,et al.  The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P. Bonfils,et al.  Clinical Applications of Evoked Acoustic Emissions: Results in Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Subjects , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[10]  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. O. Kim Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system , 1986, Hearing Research.

[13]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[14]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity , 1982, Hearing Research.