Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks

The concept of robustness of regulatory networks has received much attention in the last decade. One measure of robustness has been associated with the volume of the feasible region, namely, the region in the parameter space in which the system is functional. In this paper, we show that, in addition to volume, the geometry of this region has important consequences for the robustness and the fragility of a network. We develop an approximation within which we could algebraically specify the feasible region. We analyze the segment polarity gene network to illustrate our approach. The study of random walks in the parameter space and how they exit the feasible region provide us with a rich perspective on the different modes of failure of this network model. In particular, we found that, between two alternative ways of activating Wingless, one is more robust than the other. Our method provides a more complete measure of robustness to parameter variation. As a general modeling strategy, our approach is an interesting alternative to Boolean representation of biochemical networks.

[1]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[3]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[4]  J. Gergen,et al.  Ftz modulates Runt-dependent activation and repression of segment-polarity gene transcription , 2004, Development.

[5]  K. H. Lee,et al.  The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling , 2004, Physical biology.

[6]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Specificity and robustness in transcription control networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. W. Little,et al.  Robustness of a gene regulatory circuit , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[8]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[9]  P. Ingham,et al.  Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: spatial regulation of the segment polarity gene patched. , 1990, Development.

[10]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[11]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Symbolic reachable set computation of piecewise affine hybrid automata and its application to biological modelling: Delta-Notch protein signalling. , 2004, Systems biology.

[12]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  Software for Control System Analysis and Design: Symbol Manipulation , 1999 .

[13]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  George E. Collins,et al.  Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition I: The Basic Algorithm , 1984, SIAM J. Comput..

[15]  George E. Collins,et al.  Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition , 1975 .

[16]  Bénédicte Sanson,et al.  Generating patterns from fields of cells , 2001, EMBO reports.

[17]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[19]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.

[20]  George E. Collins,et al.  Partial Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition for Quantifier Elimination , 1991, J. Symb. Comput..

[21]  S. Eaton,et al.  Repression of ci-D in posterior compartments of Drosophila by engrailed. , 1990, Genes & development.

[22]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[24]  M Chaves,et al.  Methods of robustness analysis for Boolean models of gene control networks. , 2006, Systems biology.

[25]  S. Gavrilets,et al.  20 Questions on Adaptive Dynamics , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[26]  G. Odell,et al.  Design and constraints of the Drosophila segment polarity module: robust spatial patterning emerges from intertwined cell state switches. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[27]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[29]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[30]  W. Gehring,et al.  Localized expression of sloppy paired protein maintains the polarity of Drosophila parasegments. , 1994, Genes & development.