Triggering verbal presuppositions

This paper offers a predictive mechanism to derive the presuppositions of verbs. The starting point is the intuition, dating back at least to Stalnaker (1974), that the information conveyed by a sentence that is in some sense independent from its main point is presupposed. The contribution of this paper is to spell out a mechanism for deciding what will become the main point of the sentence and how to calculate independence. It is proposed that this can be calculated by making reference to event times. As a very rough approximation, the main point of an utterance is what (in a sense to be defined) has to be about the event time of the matrix predicate and the information that the sentence conveys but is not (or does not have to be) about the event time of the matrix predicate is presupposed. The notion of aboutness used to calculate independence is based on Demolombe and Farinas del Cerro (2000).

[1]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Conventional Implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition , 1981 .

[2]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives , 2010, J. Semant..

[3]  P. Unger,et al.  Semantics and Philosophy , 1974 .

[4]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Some observations on factivity , 1971 .

[5]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Lexical Alternatives as a Source of Pragmatic Presuppositions , 2002 .

[6]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Local contexts and local meanings , 2010 .

[7]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Knowledge and Its Limits , 2000 .

[8]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[9]  B. Abbott Presuppositions as nonassertions , 2000 .

[10]  Luis Fariñas del Cerro,et al.  Towards a Logical Characterization of Sentences of the Kind "Sentence p is about Object c" , 2000, Intellectics and Computational Logic.

[11]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  Ordered Entailments: An Alternative to Presuppositional Theories , 1979 .

[12]  Giorgio Magri A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures , 2009 .

[13]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Conversational Implicature in Montague Grammar , 1975 .

[14]  Paul Egré,et al.  QUESTION-EMBEDDING AND FACTIVITY , 2008 .

[15]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Types of Lexical Information , 1969 .

[16]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  The Lazy Frenchman’s Approach to the Subjunctive , 2005 .

[17]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Lexical Meaning in Context - A Web of Words , 2011 .

[18]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[19]  B. Partee Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English , 1973 .

[20]  S. Levinson,et al.  Why presuppositions aren't conventional , 1992 .