Audiological Assessment of Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Children

The design of an audiological assessment protocol for profoundly hearing-impaired children may be divided into three areas. First, accurate estimation of hearing loss includes the behavioral measures of unaided and aided thresholds and the objective measures of electrocochleography and auditory brain stem response. The reliability of these measures for the accurate diagnosis of a profound to total hearing loss is discussed. Second, speech perception includes the measure of perception in the audition alone, vision alone, and audition plus vision conditions. Test material should include speech features, words, and sentences. Factors influencing the choice of material are the developmental age of the child, the method of educational instruction, speech and language skills, and vocabulary limits. Third, psychophysical properties of residual auditory skills include measures such as frequency, intensity, and duration difference limens. These skills may be compared to those elicited through other sensory channels, such as visual and tactile. Other important factors that should be considered are the psychological well-being of the child and family, family motivations and expectations, and educational requirements.

[1]  J M Pickett,et al.  Auditory implants and tactile aids for the profoundly deaf. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  F. B. Simmons,et al.  Cochlear Implants in Young Children: Some Dilemmas , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[3]  G. Clark,et al.  Underlying dimensions and individual differences in auditory, visual, and auditory-visual vowel perception by hearing-impaired children. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[7]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  Brain Stem and other Responses in Electric Response Audiometry , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  E. Lechelt Temporal numerosity discrimination: intermodal comparisons revisited. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[9]  J. Redhead,et al.  An improved technique for simultaneous recording of action potential and auditory brainstem responses. , 1985, British Journal of Audiology.

[10]  Simmons Fb Cochlear implants in young children: some dilemmas. , 1985 .

[11]  J. Tyberghein,et al.  Hearing in children. , 1984, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[12]  W. House,et al.  The cochlear implant in preschool-aged children. , 1983, Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

[13]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. I. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  John Bamford,et al.  Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .

[15]  Daniel Ling,et al.  Speech and the Hearing-Impaired Child: Theory and Practice , 1976 .