Generalized degeneracy, dynamic monopolies and maximum degenerate subgraphs

A graph G is said to be k-degenerate if any subgraph of G contains a vertex of degree at most k. The degeneracy of graphs has many applications and was widely studied in graph theory. We first generalize k-degeneracy by introducing @k-degeneracy of graphs, where @k is any non-negative function on the vertex set of the graph. We present a polynomial time algorithm to determine whether a graph is @k-degenerate. Let @t:V(G)->Z be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of G. A subset of vertices D is said to be a @t-dynamic monopoly of G, if the vertices of G can be partitioned into subsets D"0,D"1,...,D"k such that D"0=D and for any [email protected]?{0,...,k-1}, each vertex v in D"i"+"1 has at least @t(v) neighbors in D"[email protected][email protected]?D"i. The concept of dynamic monopolies is used for the formulation and analysis of spread of influence such as disease or opinion in social networks and is the subject of active research in recent years. We obtain a relationship between degeneracy and dynamic monopoly of graphs and show that these two concepts are dual of each other. Using this relationship, we introduce and study dyn"t(G), which is the smallest cardinality of any @t-dynamic monopoly among all threshold assignments @t with average threshold @[email protected]?=t. We give an explicit formula for dyn"t(G), and obtain some lower and upper bounds for it. We show that dyn"t(G) is NP-complete but for complete multipartite graphs and some other classes of graphs it can be solved by polynomial time algorithms. For the regular graphs, dyn"t(G) can be approximated within a ratio of nearly 2. Finally we consider the problem of determining the maximum size of @k-degenerate (or k-degenerate) induced subgraphs in any graph and obtain some upper and lower bounds for the maximum size of such subgraphs.

[1]  Ning Chen,et al.  On the approximability of influence in social networks , 2008, SODA '08.

[2]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  Node-and edge-deletion NP-complete problems , 1978, STOC.

[3]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[4]  Fred S. Roberts,et al.  Irreversible k-threshold processes: Graph-theoretical threshold models of the spread of disease and of opinion , 2009, Discret. Appl. Math..

[5]  Manouchehr Zaker,et al.  On dynamic monopolies of graphs: The average and strict majority thresholds , 2012, Discret. Optim..

[6]  Noga Alon,et al.  Large induced degenerate subgraphs , 1987, Graphs Comb..

[7]  Tomás Kulich Dynamic monopolies with randomized starting configuration , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Manouchehr Zaker On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds , 2012, Discret. Math..

[9]  Sarah Spence Adams,et al.  Irreversible k-threshold and majority conversion processes on complete multipartite graphs and graph products , 2013, Australas. J Comb..

[10]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[11]  Eyal Ackerman,et al.  Combinatorial model and bounds for target set selection , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Paul Booth,et al.  Modeling the spread of fault in majority-based network systems: Dynamic monopolies in triangular grids , 2012, Discret. Appl. Math..

[13]  Paola Flocchini,et al.  On time versus size for monotone dynamic monopolies in regular topologies , 2000, SIROCCO.

[14]  Ching-Lueh Chang,et al.  On irreversible dynamic monopolies in general graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[15]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Bootstrap percolation on the hypercube , 2006 .

[16]  D. de Werra,et al.  Graph Coloring Problems , 2013 .

[17]  Nicholas C. Wormald,et al.  Induced Forests in Regular Graphs with Large Girth , 2008, Comb. Probab. Comput..