Evidence for Implicit Risk: Delay Facilitates the Processing of Uncertainty

Humans and other animals discount the value of rewards over time. One explanation for this is that delayed rewards may be less certain than immediate rewards, what has been referred to as the implicit risk hypothesis. Although this explanation is widely accepted, little research has directly assessed the validity of the implicit risk hypothesis. In the current study, we present two experiments in which participants made decisions about rewards involving both delay and uncertainty. By manipulating the order in which information was presented, we were able to investigate whether delay information facilitates beliefs about uncertainty and vice versa. It was found that participants were more likely to prefer larger, delayed rewards when information about delay was presented before information about uncertainty than when the information was presented in the opposite order. Additionally, we describe a process model that implements the implicit risk hypothesis and show that it is consistent with the observed patterns of data. These results support the implicit risk hypothesis and suggest that information about delay facilitates the processing of information about uncertainty

[1]  Brady Reynolds,et al.  Adolescent smokers rate delayed rewards as less certain than adolescent nonsmokers. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[2]  Toshikazu Hasegawa,et al.  A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[3]  H. Rachlin Notes on discounting. , 2006, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  W. Mischel,et al.  Waiting for rewards and punishments: effects of time and probability on choice. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[6]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Exponential Versus Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Outcomes: Risk and Waiting Time , 1996 .

[7]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits , 2003 .

[8]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  L Green,et al.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  H. de Wit,et al.  Reward discounting as a measure of impulsive behavior in a psychiatric outpatient population. , 2000, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[11]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999 .

[12]  E. Maskin,et al.  Uncertainty and Hyperbolic Discounting , 2005 .

[13]  J. MacKillop,et al.  Divergent Validity of Measures of Cognitive Distortions, Impulsivity, and Time Perspective in Pathological Gambling , 2006, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[14]  J. Richards,et al.  Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[15]  O. Azfar,et al.  Rationalizing hyperbolic discounting , 1999 .

[16]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. , 1996 .

[17]  Elizabeth A. Olson,et al.  Adolescents' performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior. , 2007, Personality and individual differences.

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[19]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  H. de Wit,et al.  Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  Matthew W. Johnson,et al.  Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[22]  D. Madan,et al.  A Two-Factor Hazard Rate Model for Pricing Risky Debt and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads , 2000, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[23]  Taiki Takahashi,et al.  Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. , 1998, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[25]  Peter D. Sozou,et al.  On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[27]  N. Petry,et al.  Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Cognition and behavior in studies of choice , 1986 .

[29]  Brady Reynolds,et al.  Question-based assessments of delay discounting: do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards? , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[30]  M. K. Stevenson,et al.  A Discounting Model for Decisions With Delayed Positive or Negative Outcomes , 1986 .

[31]  S. M. Alessi,et al.  Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[32]  S. Onay,et al.  How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice , 2009 .