Teacher Learning in Mathematics: Using Student Work to Promote Collective Inquiry

The study describes teachers' collective work in which they developed deeper understanding of their own students' mathematical thinking. Teachers at one school met in monthly workgroups throughout the year. Prior to each workgroup, they posed a similar mathematical problem to their students. The workgroup discussions centered on the student work those problems generated. This study draws on a transformation of participation perspective to address the questions: What do teachers learn through collective examination of student work? How is teacher learning evident in shifts in participation in discussions centered on student work? The analyses account for the learning of the group by documenting key shifts in teachers' participation across the year. The first shift in participation occurred when teachers as a group learned to attend to the details of children's thinking. A second shift in participation occurred as teachers began to develop possible instructional trajectories in mathematics. We focus our discussion on the significance of the use of student work and a transformation of participation view in analyzing the learning trajectory of teachers as a group.

[1]  Thomas P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction , 1999 .

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  J. Greeno THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[4]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[5]  J. Little Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work , 2002 .

[6]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Understanding Teachers' Self-Sustaining, Generative Change in the Context of Professional Development. , 1998 .

[7]  J. Wertsch Mind as action , 1998 .

[8]  Pi-Jen Lin On Enhancing Teachers' Knowledge by Constructing Cases in Classrooms , 2002 .

[9]  Barbara Jaworski,et al.  Investigating Mathematics Teaching: A Constructivist Enquiry , 1994 .

[10]  Deborah Schifter,et al.  Learning Mathematics for Teaching: From a Teachers' Seminar to the Classroom , 1998 .

[11]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Significant and Worthwhile Change in Teaching Practice , 1990 .

[12]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Development through participation in sociocultural activity. , 1995, New directions for child development.

[13]  Clea Fernandez,et al.  A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice , 2003 .

[14]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Promoting Conceptual Thinking in Four Upper-Elementary Mathematics Classrooms , 2001, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[16]  Catherine A. Brown,et al.  Learning to Teach Hard Mathematics: Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give Up Too Easily? , 1992 .

[17]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. , 1985 .

[18]  Jennifer I. Berne,et al.  Chapter 6 : Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professlonal Development , 1999 .

[19]  J. Lave Teaching, as Learning, in Practice , 1996 .

[20]  Michele D. Crockett Inquiry as professional development: creating dilemmas through teachers’ work , 2002 .