Behavior change interventions: the potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice

A central goal of behavioral medicine is the creation of evidence-based interventions for promoting behavior change. Scientific knowledge about behavior change could be more effectively accumulated using “ontologies.” In information science, an ontology is a systematic method for articulating a “controlled vocabulary” of agreed-upon terms and their inter-relationships. It involves three core elements: (1) a controlled vocabulary specifying and defining existing classes; (2) specification of the inter-relationships between classes; and (3) codification in a computer-readable format to enable knowledge generation, organization, reuse, integration, and analysis. This paper introduces ontologies, provides a review of current efforts to create ontologies related to behavior change interventions and suggests future work. This paper was written by behavioral medicine and information science experts and was developed in partnership between the Society of Behavioral Medicine’s Technology Special Interest Group (SIG) and the Theories and Techniques of Behavior Change Interventions SIG. In recent years significant progress has been made in the foundational work needed to develop ontologies of behavior change. Ontologies of behavior change could facilitate a transformation of behavioral science from a field in which data from different experiments are siloed into one in which data across experiments could be compared and/or integrated. This could facilitate new approaches to hypothesis generation and knowledge discovery in behavioral science.

[1]  H. Lowe,et al.  Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. , 1994, JAMA.

[2]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) Spanish-language physical functioning items , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  John R. Weisz,et al.  Odd Couple? Reenvisioning the Relation Between Science and Practice in the Dissemination-Implementation Era , 2014 .

[4]  F. G.,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements , 1904, Nature.

[5]  Kai R. Larsen,et al.  A Tool for Addressing Construct Identity in Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses , 2016, MIS Q..

[6]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[7]  Cynthia Helba,et al.  Grid-enabled measures: using Science 2.0 to standardize measures and share data. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Jules Berman.  The National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) , 2010 .

[9]  Dallas Swendeman,et al.  The Old Solutions Are the New Problem , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[10]  M. Johnston,et al.  From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques , 2008 .

[11]  P. Williams-Russo,et al.  The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. , 2002, Health affairs.

[12]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[13]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. , 2005, Health education research.

[14]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting an open research culture : Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency , openness , and reproducibility , 2015 .

[16]  Changrong Yuan,et al.  Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures Into Simplified Chinese Using Cognitive Interviewing Methodology , 2013, Cancer nursing.

[17]  Mathias Brochhausen,et al.  Building a drug ontology based on RxNorm and other sources , 2013, VDOS+DO@ICBO.

[18]  Matthew J. McAuliffe,et al.  Sharing Heterogeneous Data: The National Database for Autism Research , 2012, Neuroinformatics.

[19]  Edward L. Thorndike,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements , 1905 .

[20]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  Ontology learning from text: A look back and into the future , 2012, CSUR.

[21]  James G. Field,et al.  Correlational effect size benchmarks. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  S. Michie,et al.  Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review , 2014, Health psychology review.

[23]  William T Riley,et al.  From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2015, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

[24]  Edward L. Thorndike,et al.  Theory of mental and social measurements. , 1904 .

[25]  S. Kolenikov,et al.  Socioeconomic Status Measurement with Discrete Proxy Variables: Is Principal Component Analysis a Reliable Answer? , 2009 .

[26]  Susan Michie,et al.  Classification systems in behavioural science: current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences , 2012 .

[27]  Paul Gellert,et al.  Perceived Control and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation for Oral Self-Care: A Full Factorial Experimental Test of Theory-Based Persuasive Messages , 2015, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[28]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework , 2012, Implementation Science.

[29]  Juancarlos Chan,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Susan Michie,et al.  From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs. , 2015, British journal of health psychology.

[31]  Barry Smith,et al.  Ontologies as integrative tools for plant science. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[32]  Robert Arp,et al.  Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology , 2015 .

[33]  Frank S. Freeman,et al.  Interpretation of educational measurements , 1928 .

[34]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Patterns of Natural Language Use: Disclosure, Personality, and Social Integration , 2001 .

[35]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[36]  John D. McGregor,et al.  Domain * , 2004, J. Object Technol..

[37]  Anwar M. Ghuloum,et al.  ViewpointFace the inevitable, embrace parallelism , 2009, CACM.

[38]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Online Social Networks and Smoking Cessation: A Scientific Research Agenda , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  Robert West,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Goal Setting in Behavioural Support for Smoking Cessation and its Association with Outcomes , 2015, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[40]  Mark S. Litwin,et al.  How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity , 1995 .

[41]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  Susan Michie,et al.  Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change , 2012 .

[43]  Lawrence J. Kagen,et al.  Evaluation of the Patient , 2009 .

[44]  C. Stivers.  Class , 2010 .

[45]  Michael P Kelly,et al.  The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment , 2012, Social theory & health : STH.

[46]  David Cella,et al.  Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety: linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS Anxiety. , 2014, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[47]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[48]  Adam Jacobs,et al.  The pathologies of big data , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[49]  S Michie.  INTEGRATING CONSTRUCTS ACROSS 83 THEORIES OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE: DEVELOPMENT OFA METHOD , 2015 .

[50]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting an open research culture , 2015, Science.

[51]  Jingjing Li,et al.  Establishing Nomological Networks for Behavioral Science: a Natural Language Processing Based Approach , 2011, ICIS.

[52]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[53]  Peggy L. Chinn,et al.  Theory and nursing: A systematic approach , 1983 .

[54]  LeighAnne Olsen,et al.  Patients Charting the Course: Citizen Engagement in the Learning Health System: Workshop Summary , 2014 .

[55]  C. Abraham,et al.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[56]  Diana Baader,et al.  Theory And Nursing A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[57]  A. Sias.  Interpretation of educational measurements. , 1928 .

[58]  Antonino Fiannaca,et al.  An ontology design methodology for Knowledge-Based systems with application to bioinformatics , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB).

[59]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[60]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[61]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Linking behaviour change techniques with theory , 2015 .