Clinical Management Strategies for Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: A Survey of Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a commonly used mode of ventilation designed to increase mean airway pressure and thus oxygenation. Different strategies for clinical management have been described in the literature but are largely based on physiologic concepts, animal data, and small clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to determine how APRV is currently managed by surveying practicing respiratory therapists with experience using APRV. METHODS: A 15-item survey was developed by the authors and posted on the AARConnect online media platform in January 2016 after being declared exempt by our institution's institutional review board. Survey questions were derived from a literature review of recommended APRV settings. Responses were limited to one per institution. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 60 respondents who used APRV. Of the 4 key initial APRV settings (P high, P low, T high, and T low), there was good agreement among survey responders and published guidelines for setting initial T high (4–6 s) and initial P low (0 cm H2O). There was some disagreement regarding initial P high, with 48% of responders matching P high to conventional ventilation plateau pressures but another 31% using conventional ventilation mean airway pressure plus 2–5 cm H2O. The most disagreement was with the T low setting, with only 47% of survey responders agreeing with published guidelines about using the expiratory flow signal to set T low. There was good agreement among survey responders and published guidelines for what changes to make when gas exchange was outside of the targeted range. A substantial number of respondents accepted P high and APRV release volumes that may exceed lung-protective limits. CONCLUSIONS: There is only limited consensus among practitioners for initial APRV settings, probably reflecting the paucity of good clinical outcome data and confusion surrounding the physiology of this mode.

[1]  D. Talmor,et al.  Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[2]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Chatburn,et al.  Tidal Volume Variability During Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Case Summary and Theoretical Analysis , 2012, Respiratory Care.

[4]  Robert L Chatburn,et al.  Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: What Do We Know? , 2011, Respiratory Care.

[5]  R. Chatburn,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation: An alternative mode of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2011, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

[6]  Philip Smith,et al.  A randomized prospective trial of airway pressure release ventilation and low tidal volume ventilation in adult trauma patients with acute respiratory failure. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  A. Anzueto,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation versus assist-control ventilation: a comparative propensity score and international cohort study , 2010, Intensive Care Medicine.

[8]  Brent D. Kenney.  Airway pressure-release ventilation. , 2008, Respiratory care.

[9]  N. Habashi,et al.  Other approaches to open-lung ventilation: Airway pressure release ventilation , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[10]  P. Valta,et al.  Airway pressure release ventilation as a primary ventilatory mode in acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  I. Jousela,et al.  Combined effects of prone positioning and airway pressure release ventilation on gas exchange in patients with acute lung injury , 2003, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  N Mutz,et al.  Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  R. Kacmarek,et al.  The effects of applied vs auto-PEEP on local lung unit pressure and volume in a four-unit lung model. , 1995, Chest.

[14]  M. Sydow,et al.  Long-term effects of two different ventilatory modes on oxygenation in acute lung injury. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation and volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.