3D modeling of tool wear and optimization in hard turning considering the effects of tool cutting edge and nose radii

3D modeling of tool wear and optimization of hard turning have been performed in this study considering the tool geometry parameters, i.e., cutting edge and nose radii. Optimization is carried out using multiple objective and constraint, and it employs a meta-model that is developed using response surfaces based on radial basis functions. A 3D finite element model has been developed considering the tool geometry and is verified using force measurement during hard turning experiments on H-13. Chip formation simulations have been done using the coupled temperature displacement analysis based on explicit dynamics. The tool wear model is implemented using Usui’s model for adhesive wear. This model takes input from the steady-state chip formation analysis, and the contact nodes on the tool are repositioned according to the wear rate and time increment. The model is able to predict chip morphology, force components, tool wear, stress, and temperature distributions. The effects of cutting edge and nose radii on tool stresses, tool wear, and temperature have been discussed. For optimization search genetic algorithm, MOGA-II is selected which has been used to optimize tool temperature and material removal rate during hard turning. Optimize solutions suggest the selection of high to moderate cutting edge and nose radii, large feeds, and low to moderate cutting speeds.

[1]  Y. K. Chou,et al.  Tool nose radius effects on finish hard turning , 2004 .

[2]  Giuseppina Ambrogio,et al.  A hybrid finite element method–artificial neural network approach for predicting residual stresses and the optimal cutting conditions during hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel , 2008 .

[3]  C. Raju,et al.  Parametric analysis and optimization of hard turning at different levels of hardness using wiper ceramic insert , 2020 .

[4]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Modeling of hard part machining: effect of insert edge preparation in CBN cutting tools , 2003 .

[5]  T. Kitagawa,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Three Dimensional Cutting Process—Part 3: Cutting Temperature and Crater Wear of Carbide Tool , 1978 .

[6]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  Modelling of temperature and forces when orthogonally machining hardened steel , 1999 .

[7]  S. Arfaoui,et al.  Optimization of hard turning process parameters using the response surface methodology and finite element simulations , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[8]  H. Takeyama,et al.  Basic Investigation of Tool Wear , 1963 .

[9]  B. Denkena,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of hard turning with multi-chamfered cutting edges , 2020, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[10]  M. Yallese,et al.  Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool , 2010 .

[11]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Journal of Materials Processing Technology Computational Modelling of 3d Turning: Influence of Edge Micro-geometry on Forces, Stresses, Friction and Tool Wear in Pcbn Tooling , 2022 .

[12]  Saroj Kumar Patel,et al.  Performance evaluation of various cutting fluids using MQL technique in hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel , 2020 .

[13]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks , 2005 .

[14]  M. Nouari,et al.  Study on cutting performance of cermet tool in turning of hardened alloy steel , 2020 .

[15]  J. Uricek,et al.  Decomposition of cutting forces with respect to chip segmentation and white layer thickness when hard turning 100Cr6 , 2020 .

[16]  Adem Çiçek,et al.  The effects of CryoMQL conditions on tool wear and surface integrity in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel , 2020 .

[17]  Prithbey Raj Dey,et al.  Taguchi S/N based optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness, tool wear and material removal rate in hard turning under MQL cutting condition , 2018, Measurement.

[18]  M. C. Shaw Dimensional analysis for wear systems , 1977 .

[19]  Salim Belhadi,et al.  Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool , 2014 .

[20]  Jan-Eric Ståhl,et al.  Effect of cutting edge radius on surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[21]  Manas Das,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters during sustainable dry hard turning of AISI 52100 steel with newly develop HSN2-coated carbide insert , 2019, Measurement.

[22]  M. Cemal Cakir,et al.  Finite element analysis of cutting tools prior to fracture in hard turning operations , 2005 .

[23]  J. Horng,et al.  Investigating the machinability evaluation of Hadfield steel in the hard turning with Al2O3/TiC mixed ceramic tool based on the response surface methodology , 2008 .

[24]  Hassen Khlifi,et al.  An equivalent geometry model for turning tool with nose and edge radii , 2019 .

[25]  Pengfei Tian,et al.  Three-dimensional turning force prediction based on hybrid finite element and predictive machining theory considering edge radius and nose radius , 2020 .

[26]  Dazhong Wang,et al.  Finite-element-analysis of the effect of different wiper tool edge geometries during the hard turning of AISI 4340 steel , 2019, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[27]  J. Ferreira,et al.  A multivariate hybrid approach applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel turning optimization , 2007 .