Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Attraction to Stressed or Baited Ash Trees

ABSTRACT Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), has killed millions of ash (Fraxinus sp.) trees in North America since its discovery in Michigan in 2002. Efficient methods to detect low-density A. planipennis populations remain a critical priority for regulatory and resource management agencies. We compared the density of adult A. planipennis captured on sticky bands and larval density among ash trees that were girdled for 1 or 2 yr, wounded, exposed to the stress-elicitor methyl jasmonate, baited with Manuka oil lures, or left untreated. Studies were conducted at four sites in 2006 and 2007, where A. planipennis densities on untreated trees ranged from very low to moderate. In 2006, 1-yr girdled trees captured significantly more adult A. planipennis and had higher larval densities than untreated control trees or trees treated with methyl jasmonate or Manuka oil. Open-grown trees captured significantly more A. planipennis beetles than partially or fully shaded trees. In 2007, A. planipennis population levels and captures of adult A. planipennis were substantially higher than in 2006. The density of adults captured on sticky bands did not differ significantly among canopy exposure classes or treatments in 2007. Larval density was significantly higher in untreated, wounded, and 1-yr girdled trees (girdled in 2007) than in 2-yr girdled trees (girdled in 2006), where most phloem was consumed by A. planipennis larvae the previous year. A total of 36 trees (32 in 2006, 4 in 2007) caught no beetles, but 16 of those trees (13 in 2006, 3 in 2007) had A. planipennis larvae. In 2006, there was a positive linear relationship between the density of adults captured on sticky bands and larval density in trees. Our results show that freshly girdled and open grown trees were most attractive to A. planipennis, especially at low-density sites. If girdled trees are used for A. planipennis detection or survey, debarking trees to locate larval galleries is crucial.

[1]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[2]  G. Barter Studies of the Bronze Birch Borer, Agrilus anxius Gory, in New Brunswick , 1957, The Canadian Entomologist.

[3]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[4]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[5]  R. Haack,et al.  THE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF THE TWOLINED CHESTNUT BORER, AGRILUS BILINEATUS (COLEOPTERA: BUPRESTIDAE), ON OAKS, QUERCUS SPP., IN WISCONSIN , 1982, The Canadian Entomologist.

[6]  W. Boland,et al.  Herbivore‐induced volatiles: The emission of acyclic homoterpenes from leaves of Phaseolus lunatus and Zea mays can be triggered by a β‐glucosidase and jasmonic acid , 1994, FEBS letters.

[7]  W. Boland,et al.  Induction of plant volatile biosynthesis by jasmonates , 1998 .

[8]  Jörg Bohlmann,et al.  Induction of Volatile Terpene Biosynthesis and Diurnal Emission by Methyl Jasmonate in Foliage of Norway Spruce1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[9]  V. Franceschi,et al.  Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Ethylene Production Is Responsible for Conifer Phloem Defense Responses and Reprogramming of Stem Cambial Zone for Traumatic Resin Duct Formation , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[10]  D. Cipollini,et al.  Age-Dependent Effects of Jasmonic Acid Treatment and Wind Exposure on Foliar Oxidase Activity and Insect Resistance in Tomato , 1999, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  C. Rodriguez‐Saona,et al.  EXOGENOUS METHYL JASMONATE INDUCES VOLATILE EMISSIONS IN COTTON PLANTS , 2001, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[12]  P. Groot,et al.  Developing Attractants and Trapping Techniques for the Emerald Ash Borer , 2005 .

[13]  P. Groot,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of Manchurian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica , 2006, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[14]  C. Rodriguez‐Saona,et al.  The jasmonate pathway alters herbivore feeding behaviour: consequences for plant defences , 2005 .

[15]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge , 2005 .

[16]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Progress toward developing trapping techniques for the emerald ash borer , 2005 .

[17]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the Urban Forest and the Threat to North America’s Ash Resource , 2006, Journal of Forestry.

[18]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An analysis of variance test for normality ( complete samp 1 es ) t , 2007 .

[19]  T. Poland,et al.  Evaluation of a multicomponent trap for emerald ash borer incorporating color, silhouette, height, texture, and ash leaf and bark volatiles , 2007 .

[20]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Effects of trap design and placement on capture of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis , 2007 .

[21]  D. McCullough,et al.  Estimating Potential Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Populations Using Ash Inventory Data , 2007, Journal of economic entomology.

[22]  T. Poland,et al.  Emerald ash borer trap trees: evaluation of stress agents and trap height , 2007 .

[23]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Double-deckers and towers: emerald ash borer traps in 2007 , 2008 .

[24]  P. Groot,et al.  Electrophysiological Response and Attraction of Emerald Ash Borer to Green Leaf Volatiles (GLVs) Emitted by Host Foliage , 2008, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[25]  T. Poland,et al.  Development of a Host-Based Semiochemical Lure for Trapping Emerald Ash Borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) , 2008, Environmental entomology.

[26]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatment, or wounding , 2009 .

[27]  D. Crook,et al.  Chemical Ecology of the Emerald Ash Borer Agrilus planipennis , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.