Fluconazole versus nystatin in the treatment of oral candidosis.

The efficacy of oral fluconazole versus nystatin was evaluated as a treatment modality for oral candidosis. Of the included patients (n = 60), two-thirds presented with an erythematous candidosis, and the others showed clinical signs compatible with a pseudomembranous candidosis. Predisposing factors were xerostomia (n = 18), HIV (n = 5), immunosuppression in conjunction with organ transplantation (n = 10), and wearing of dentures (n = 14). For the remaining patients no specific predisposing factors were found. One patient who was treated with nystatin was excluded owing to nausea that was related to the antifungal treatment. After 7 days of treatment with fluconazole (50 mg/day), the affected oral mucosa, assessed by the investigator, was cured or showed considerable improvement in 87% of the patients (n = 30). The corresponding figure for the nystatin group (n = 30), rinsing with 1 mL 4 times a day for 21 days, was 80%. Following treatment with fluconazole, 20 of 22 patients with symptoms at the start (91%) reported improvement. The comparable figures for the nystatin group were 10 of 12 patients (83%). Half of the patients in the nystatin group reported inconvenience from taking the medication (mean value = 25.9) compared with 23% of the patients in the fluconazole group (mean value = 6.6). Eight patients in the fluconazole group and 12 patients in the nystatin group exhibited a relapse within 6 months. These differences were not found to be statistically significant. The patients in the fluconazole group reported less inconvenience from taking the medication, a finding that may have clinical implications for compliance.

[1]  V. Bissell,et al.  Comparative trial of fluconazole and amphotericin in the treatment of denture stomatitis. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  P. Lamey,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of oral candidosis. , 1991, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  F. Meunier,et al.  Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in the immunocompromised host: a randomized double-blind study of fluconazole vs. ketoconazole. , 1990, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[4]  E. Oksala Factors predisposing to oral yeast infections. , 1990, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  T. Axéll,et al.  Classification and clinical manifestations of oral yeast infections. , 1990, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[6]  H. Goossens,et al.  COMPARISON OF FLUCONAZOLE AND KETOCONAZOLE FOR OROPHARYNGEAL CANDIDIASIS IN AIDS , 1989, The Lancet.

[7]  P. Holmstrup,et al.  Fluconazole in the treatment of Candida-associated denture stomatitis , 1988, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  J. Epstein,et al.  Oral candidiasis: effects of antifungal therapy upon clinical signs and symptoms, salivary antibody, and mucosal adherence of Candida albicans. , 1981, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[9]  G. Isacsson,et al.  Effect of nystatin in the treatment of denture stomatitis. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[10]  D. Walker,et al.  The prevalence and intra-oral distribution of Candida albicans in man. , 1980, Archives of oral biology.

[11]  H. Shwachman,et al.  SCREENING FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS , 1976, The Lancet.