Evidence for Positive Epistasis in HIV-1

Reproductive strategies such as sexual reproduction and recombination that involve the shuffling of parental genomes for the production of offspring are ubiquitous in nature. However, their evolutionary benefit remains unclear. Many theories have identified potential benefits, but progress is hampered by the scarcity of relevant data. One class of theories is based on the assumption that mutations affecting fitness exhibit negative epistasis. Retroviruses recombine frequently and thus provide a unique opportunity to test these theories. Using amino acid sequence data and fitness values from 9466 human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) isolates, we find in contrast to these theories strong statistical evidence for a predominance of positive epistasis in HIV-1.

[1]  P. Feldman.  Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[2]  J. Coffin.  Structure, replication, and recombination of retrovirus genomes: some unifying hypotheses. , 1979, The Journal of general virology.

[3]  F B Christiansen,et al.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. Kondrashov.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[5]  H. Temin.  Sex and recombination in retroviruses. , 1991, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[6]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[7]  N. Barton,et al.  A general model for the evolution of recombination. , 1995, Genetical research.

[8]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[9]  M W Feldman,et al.  Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[11]  Santiago F. Elena,et al.  Little Evidence for Synergism Among Deleterious Mutations in a Nonsegmented RNA Virus , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[12]  S. Otto,et al.  Evolution of sex: Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  G. Bocharov,et al.  Recombination: Multiply infected spleen cells in HIV patients , 2002, Nature.

[14]  W. Rice.  Evolution of sex: Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  C. Burch,et al.  Patterns of epistasis in RNA viruses: a review of the evidence from vaccine design , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  S. West,et al.  TESTING FOR EPISTASIS BETWEEN DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS IN A PARASITOID WASP , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Recombination in HIV and the evolution of drug resistance: for better or for worse? , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  Rafael Sanjuán,et al.  The contribution of epistasis to the architecture of fitness in an RNA virus. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  G. Shaw,et al.  Dynamics of HIV-1 recombination in its natural target cells , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Christina L. Burch,et al.  Epistasis and Its Relationship to Canalization in the RNA Virus φ6 , 2004, Genetics.