Errorless learning of novel associations in amnesia

In two experiments involving verbal association learning by people with memory impairments, the effectiveness of errorless learning (EL) was compared with errorful learning (EF). Experiment 1 examined the effectiveness of both methods in learning remotely linked word pairs. There was an advantage for items learned by EL at immediate test which was not sustained over a delay of 1 hr. Learning appeared to be stable over this delay in the EF condition. Analysis of responses at delayed cued recall showed more evidence of spontaneous recovery in EF than in EL. Elimination of these items from analysis resulted in a similar pattern of forgetting in both methods. Experiment 2 examined the effectiveness of EL and EF in teaching novel associations, and showed an advantage for EL at immediate and delayed test. Forgetting was apparently observed following EL, but not EF. As in Experiment 1, this discrepancy was attributed to recovered responses at delayed test in EF. Eliminating these responses showed a similar pattern of forgetting in both methods for items correctly recalled at immediate test. The study shows an advantage for EL techniques in learning novel associations. The two methods also differ in that learning via EF is associated with more spontaneous recovery.

[1]  N. Hunkin,et al.  Are the benefits of errorless learning dependent on implicit memory? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  H. Nelson A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[3]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  E. Squires M emory Notebook Training in a Case of Severe Amnesia: Generalising from Paired Associate Learning to Real Life. , 1996, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[5]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The Involvement of the Frontal Lobes in Cognitive Estimation , 1978, Cortex.

[6]  G Mandler,et al.  The information that amnesic patients do not forget. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  E. Reingold,et al.  SEPARATING CONSCIOUSLY CONTROLLED AND AUTOMATIC INFLUENCES IN MEMORY FOR NEW ASSOCIATIONS , 1996 .

[8]  B. Underwood,et al.  An analysis of some shortcomings in the interference theory of forgetting. , 1966, Psychological review.

[9]  N. Hunkin,et al.  The method of vanishing cues: An evaluation of its effectiveness in teaching memory-impaired individuals , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Wheeler,et al.  Improvement in recall over time without repeated testing: Spontaneous recovery revisited. , 1995 .

[11]  Va Jenkins Novel word association priming in amnesic patients. , 1996 .

[12]  Aldrich Fk Can implicit memory be exploited to facilitate the learning of novel associations , 1995 .

[13]  David G. Payne,et al.  Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. , 1987 .

[14]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people , 1994 .

[15]  Barbara A. Wilson,et al.  When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  H. Terrace,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT " ERRORS " ' , 2005 .